Covid-19 vaccine boosters: is a third dose really needed?

Evidence suggests it would be far better to send the doses to poor countries, where vaccine coverage is low

Research suggests vaccines offer robust protection against variants. The problem is that until there is high coverage worldwide we can't expect to escape the pandemic.
Research suggests vaccines offer robust protection against variants. The problem is that until there is high coverage worldwide we can't expect to escape the pandemic. (Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg)

The UK is enjoying real success with its Covid-19 vaccine coverage. About 85% of adults (44,8 million people) have received one dose and 63% (33 million people) both jabs, with about 160,000 doses a day still being administered.

Vaccination with two doses helps prevent infection and in those that do still get infected, lessens the impact of the virus by reducing disease severity, transmission of infection and death.

Even so, plans to give people a third shot have been unveiled by the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). The main arguments to support giving a third dose are that the effectiveness of the first two jabs falls over time and that there’s a need to take new vaccines to deal with viral variants, such as the Delta variant. But what does the evidence say?

Several studies have investigated the durability of immunity to Covid-19 and their results are encouraging. Researchers have focused on specialised white blood cells called lymphocytes. These come in two main varieties: B cells, which make antibodies, and T cells, which can help the B-cell response or directly kill the virus.

Antibodies play a critical role in stopping viruses entering the body’s cells, which is what the virus needs to do to replicate. You can readily measure someone’s antibody levels in a blood sample, but the data on what a typical person’s antibody levels are after vaccination or infection with Covid-19 have been variable.

Most people have good persistent levels of antibodies that can be detected for at least seven months. However, some have quite low levels of antibodies or their levels rapidly fall after infection or vaccination. Such variability makes it difficult to know how useful antibody data alone is for measuring lasting immunity to infection.

A clearer picture can emerge if other indicators of immunity are considered: our B and T cells. A recent preprint (a piece of research still awaiting review by other scientists) suggests looking at antibodies and T cells gives a clearer picture of whether immunity has lasted.

And reassuringly, functional T-cell responses against Covid-19 have been detected six months after infection. Similarly, memory B cells — long-lasting cells kept on hand in case the immune system encounters Covid-19 in the future — have been detected in people even when their antibody levels have fallen so low as to be undetectable (though this research is also still awaiting review). This suggests that even after their antibodies have waned over time, these people have the means to quickly produce new ones should they face the coronavirus again.

A huge concern should be that the majority of people in the world still remain unvaccinated. In many low-income countries as little as 1% of eligible adults have received one vaccine dose. Poor vaccine coverage enables the virus to thrive.

People over the age of 80 often have less effective immune responses when infected or vaccinated, meaning their overall immunity may be lower and fade more quickly. In any booster campaign they would be likely to be prioritised. However, so far the data for older people has been encouraging. Another recent preprint has shown that older people produce a strong immune response after vaccination.

All these studies are immensely reassuring. Added to what we know about immune responses to viruses more widely, there’s growing confidence that immunity to Covid-19 is durable — though longer-term studies will still be needed. Nevertheless, right now there isn’t strong evidence that people’s immunity needs topping up with a booster.

Can current vaccines handle variants?

There are now four variants of the coronavirus in circulation — Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta — being deemed variants of concern (VOCs). These spread more easily, cause worse disease or are less well managed by vaccines.

Initial studies on the effectiveness of vaccines against the Alpha variant, one of the first discovered, have been encouraging. And while early data on the Gamma variant suggested it may be somewhat able to evade immunity, a subsequent preprint suggests vaccines still protect against it.

There have been concerns too about the Delta variant. However, data from Public Health England (also still in preprint) suggests vaccines offer robust protection against it. Even when vaccines give reduced protection, as seen with the Beta variant, more early research (again awaiting review) suggests they still protect against the worst impacts of disease.

The evidence is showing vaccination is working: immunity is lasting and protecting us against the worst effects of Covid-19. So why is the UK planning on third booster shots when there isn’t clear evidence that there’s a need? A huge concern should be that the majority of people in the world still remain unvaccinated. In many low-income countries as little as 1% of eligible adults have received one vaccine dose.

Poor vaccine coverage enables the virus to thrive. When it infects and reproduces in many thousands of people, this gives the virus an opportunity to mutate, which can lead to new variants emerging. It’s no coincidence that the variants of concern (VOCs) all emerged from areas with high levels of viral transmission. There are also at least seven variants of interest that have emerged from areas with high levels of viral transmission. These are viruses with the potential to be VOCs and so are being monitored to see what threats they could pose.

To prevent more VOCs appearing we urgently need to get ahead of the virus, not just in the UK, but everywhere. The evidence to date doesn’t suggest there’s an urgent need to give people a third Covid-19 vaccine dose in rich countries like the UK. It would be better to give those doses to countries with low coverage, rather than launching a booster programme. Because until we have high vaccine coverage around the world, we can never truly hope to escape this pandemic.

Sheena Cruickshank is a professor in biomedical sciences at the University of Manchester in the UK.

This article was first published by The Conversation

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon

Related Articles