PODCAST | Explained: The Janusz Waluś judgment is based on solid legal reasoning

In this short edition of 'Eusebius on TimesLIVE', our contributor and analyst explains the Constitutional Court’s legal reasoning for its order that SACP leader Chris Hani’s assassin, Janusz Waluś, be paroled.

In the eyes of many, Chris Hani represented respectable, popular black leadership — and victory against a system that infantilised black people and white women, says the writer. File photo.
In the eyes of many, Chris Hani represented respectable, popular black leadership — and victory against a system that infantilised black people and white women, says the writer. File photo. (Tim Zielenbach)

Listen to the analysis, here: 

In this short edition of Eusebius on TimesLIVE, our contributor and analyst explains the Constitutional Court’s legal reasoning for its order that SACP leader Chris Hani’s assassin, Janusz Waluś, be paroled.

Eusebius McKaiser explains why, in his view, the decision is legally sound in terms of constitutional jurisprudence.

He examines the political and ethical context and consequences of the judgment, recognising that the legal reasoning cannot displace complex psycho-political dynamics in the country.

To listen to previous episodes, go here.

Subscribe for future episodes: iono.fmSpotifyGoogle PlayApple PodcastsPlayer.fmPocket Cast


Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon