Facebook must face up to sex-trafficking claims, US court rules

The platform has failed to have a case, accusing it of being the reason women were forced into prostitution, thrown out

Bui Van Thuan, an online honey salesman and chemistry teacher, was detained in August last year, days after he posted a comment on Facebook questioning authorities after panic buying ahead of a coronavirus lockdown.
Bui Van Thuan, an online honey salesman and chemistry teacher, was detained in August last year, days after he posted a comment on Facebook questioning authorities after panic buying ahead of a coronavirus lockdown. (REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo)

Facebook must face lawsuits filed by three women who say they were forced into prostitution as teenagers by abusers who used the social media site to ensnare girls.

Justice James Blacklock of the Texas Supreme Court said in a ruling on Friday the women can sue the platform under a state law that allows legal action against those who benefit from sex trafficking. But he said they can’t pursue claims under federal law that Facebook failed to warn minors and take measures to block sex-trafficking activity on its site.

Facebook hasn’t put effective safeguards in place to block sex traffickers because it benefits from advertising to more than two billion users, according to the lawsuits. The women say the company won’t use advertising space for public service announcements regarding the dangers of sex trafficking.

Perhaps advances in technology now allow online platforms to more easily police their users’ posts. On the other hand, perhaps subjecting online platforms to greater liability for their users’ injurious activity would reduce freedom of speech on the internet by encouraging platforms to censor ‘dangerous’ content to avoid lawsuits.

—  Justice James Blacklock, Texas Supreme Court

Facebook appealed to the US Supreme Court after it failed to get the complaints thrown out in a district court and the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Texas. The company argued that it is protected under Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act, which shields websites from lawsuits involving what users post online.

The judge rejected that argument. “The statutory claim for knowingly or intentionally benefiting from participation in a human-trafficking venture is not barred by Section 230,” he ruled.

Facebook didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Blacklock sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings and suggested the Section 230 provisions written in 1996 may be outdated and ripe for Congress to overhaul.

“Perhaps advances in technology now allow online platforms to more easily police their users’ posts,” Blacklock said. “On the other hand, perhaps subjecting online platforms to greater liability for their users’ injurious activity would reduce freedom of speech on the internet by encouraging platforms to censor ‘dangerous’ content to avoid lawsuits.”

In March, a federal court in Houston, Texas, ruled that Salesforce.com face state and federal litigation over sex-trafficking facilitation complaints by several young women who said their pimps repeatedly sold them for sex through Backpage.com classified ads.

— Bloomberg News. More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon

Related Articles