Cheaper, enviro-friendly biofuel keeps Kenyan home fires burning

Nairobi’s fuel dispensers replace charcoal, kerosene with ethanol biofuel made from sugar cane byproducts

A tractor transports sugar cane from a farm to a sugar factory in Mumias in western Kenya.
A tractor transports sugar cane from a farm to a sugar factory in Mumias in western Kenya. (REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya)

In Kenya’s capital Nairobi, restaurant owner Miriam Kamau lifts a steaming ladle of food from a stove burning locally produced ethanol — a fuel made from the byproducts of sugar production.

She is one of about 200,000 customers of three-year-old Kenyan company Koko, which has replaced fuels such as charcoal, kerosene and liquefied petroleum gas with locally produced ethanol.

Ethanol from agricultural waste helps cut down on greenhouse emissions — partly because consumers won’t be using charcoal made from cutting down trees.

The UN Environmental Programme says sugar cane bioethanol can reduce emissions by 40-62% compared to petroleum-derived fuels.

Customers also like it because it’s cheaper.

Kenya has given ethanol producers using sugar processing waste an exemption from its 16% VAT to encourage ethanol production to grow in tandem with the sugar industry.

“We were among the first to use it,” Kamau said as she laid a table and waited for customers. “It has helped very much. Right now I don’t even know how much cooking gas costs.”

Koko sells a litre of its biofuel for 77.83 Kenya shillings (R10.50); the minimum purchase is 30 shillings (R4). A litre of kerosene in Nairobi costs 110.82 shillings (R15); gas can only be bought in more expensive canisters.

Koko distributes its fuel using dispensers scattered about Nairobi that allow customers to buy any amount of fuel using mobile money services.

The potential market is huge — about 900-million people in Africa use dirty fuel for cooking, contributing to air pollution that causes an estimated 500,000 premature deaths on the continent each year, the World Health Organisation says.

Biofuels can be both economical and environmentally friendly, said Mario Loyola, a senior fellow at the Washington DC-based think-tank Competitive Enterprise Institute.

But they have also sometimes been criticised — big government subsidies in the US and Europe have distorted energy markets and led to sweeping changes in land-use patterns with environmentally devastating consequences, Loyola said.

Michael Wakoli, head of fuel operations at Koko, said their locally produced bioethanol was molasses-based, a waste by-product from the sugar refining process.

“I am using the waste of the product that is used to make sugar and molasses and so on to create something that can be used again,” he said.

Kenya has given ethanol producers using sugar processing waste an exemption from its 16% VAT to encourage ethanol production to grow in tandem with the sugar industry — one of the nation’s most common crops.

Koko plans to expand to 10 other Kenyan towns in the near future, Wakoli said.

— Reuters

Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.

Comment icon