Isn't the current system's problem a lack of enforcement and visible policing?
Yes.
How's a new system going to fix that?
The focus is going to move away from electronic enforcement, where you've got too many cameras, to a more personal, interactive enforcement.
More cops on the road?
Exactly.
Why do you need a new system to get cops on the road?
It's not only about this. Through this interaction the alleged infringer is also much more empowered to take action.
How?
He will now have five different options he can exercise.
Can he go to court?
Not directly.
Will he have to pay the fine first?
No. The beauty of the new system is we want to do everything administratively because then you can bring ... efficiencies.
Do you have the capacity for that?
Absolutely. Remember, the RTIA is sitting in a neutral place. We play the role of an independent arbiter between the alleged infringer and the traffic department.Aren't you dependent on that portion?
That would be right.
So you have a direct interest in the infringer being made to pay a fine?
We exercise unfettered consideration of the representations that somebody lays with us. If we find the infringer is right there is no payment whatsoever.
If you decide he must pay, can he appeal?
Absolutely. There is a new structure called the Infringement Appeals Tribunal.
Who will preside over it?
It will be headed by qualified, competent people.
Appointed by you?
Absolutely not. By the president.
How is this an improvement on the current system, with an independent judge?
In the sense that you would not be clogging the courts with traffic infringements. You have an internal appeals mechanism.
Do you still have the right to go to court?
Absolutely.
Where does this leave your tribunal?
You'll have to go there first...