US court rules bone marrow donors can be paid
Some bone marrow donors in the United States can now be paid for their donations, similar to blood, egg and sperm donors, according to a court ruling.
The federal appeals court said on Thursday that new technologies for transplanting bone marrow make the tissue more like blood and less like an organ.
The National Organ Transplant Act prohibits compensation for human organs, such as kidneys, but allows payment for renewable tissues such as blood.
A California non-profit group called MoreMarrowDonors.org, parents of sick children and a physician sued US Attorney General Eric Holder in 2009, challenging the ban on compensation for bone marrow donations. They argued that allowing financial incentives for bone marrow donation was crucial because of the extreme difficulty of finding a genetic match.
The suit said the ban violated the US Constitution because it treated bone marrow as a “human organ” while allowing payments for blood, sperm and eggs.
The government said that payments could lead to exploitation of people in financial need.
A California court sided with the government, but the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed.
“Once the stem cells are in the bloodstream, they are a subpart of the blood, not the bone marrow,” Judge Andrew Kleinfeld wrote on behalf of the three-judge panel.
Charles Miller, a spokesman for the Justice Department, declined to comment.
“This decision fundamentally changes how deadly blood diseases will be treated in America,” said Jeff Rowes, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs.
He said one of the biggest challenges has been encouraging people identified as a rare match to go through with the donation.
MoreMarrowDonors.org had wanted to offer donors $3 000 in scholarships, housing allowances or gifts to charities of their choice.
Rowes said any form of compensation is now available to recruit donors, and patients can now ask their insurance companies to pay donors identified as a match.