Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40998.58
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3361.59
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11703.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46637.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5763
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4987
    UP 0.23%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3835
    UP 0.04%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0947
    UP 0.14%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2551
    UP 0.14%

  • Gold : 1386.6000
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1452.5000
    UP 0.31%
    Silver : 22.4000
    UP 0.16%
    Palladium : 727.0000
    UP 0.55%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.640
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sun May 26 11:35:14 SAST 2013

'We want out of SA'

NASHIRA DAVIDS | 22 February, 2012 00:31
The Voortrekker Monument, in Pretoria, a national heritage site - some asylum applicants have said they are targeted in South Africa because they are Afrikaners Picture: ALON SKUY

A South African family is desperate to remain in the US, its members claiming they cannot return home because, as Afrikaners, they will be subject to racial discrimination.

The family's legal representative has been contacting US academics in a bid to get a scholarly opinion that would bolster the asylum application.

The family, described by the law firm as "white Afrikaner farmers", is among dozens of South Africans who, over the past decade, have applied for asylum abroad for a range of reasons, including fear of persecution and violent crime. Some of the applications have been successful.

When contacted for comment, the family's lawyer, Rehim Babaoglu, said the family was too afraid to be identified.

"They were shocked to hear that a reporter was seeking information and they have no comment. They definitely don't want to participate because of privacy and safety concerns," said Babaoglu.

But Professor Mark Behr, of Rhodes College, in Memphis, Tennessee, and Dr Dennis Laumann, of the University of Memphis, have rejected requests that they help the family.

"I am not interested in assisting Afrikaners claiming discrimination in a non-racial, democratic, post-apartheid South Africa," wrote Laumann.

"In my scholarly opinion, there is absolutely no basis for their allegation - whatever evidence they may present."

Behr - who is an award-winning South African author - said he did not believe the law firm would find "any fair-minded scholar" to support the family.

"If the people your firm seeks to represent are in any way victims of racism, it is, sadly, only a racism of their own making, in their own minds.

"Let me add, too, that I speak as a white Afrikaner, from a family of farmers, people who themselves lost farms they owned in Africa, and with my own profound empathy for all people who live off the land in South Africa," replied Behr.

But the family is not alone in attempting to flee post-apartheid South Africa:

  • According to latest statistics from the US Department of Homeland Security, about 129 South Africans were granted asylum between 2001 and 2010;
  • Immigration New Zealand's general manager for settlement, protection and attraction, Stephen Dunstan, said 48 South Africans had applied for refugee status since 2006. All were rejected; and
  • Germany's Federal Office for Migration and Refugees received nine applications for asylum between 2009 and 2011.

Russell Kaplan, the lawyer for South African Brandon Huntley, who is still fighting for refugee status in Canada, said the trend was growing.

"My office is involved in other South African claims - I prefer not to say how many - and I continue to speak to many white South Africans every month who report increasing fear for themselves and their families," Kaplan said.

Gary Eisenberg, who specialises in immigration law, said that, though the topic was complex, he believed that many applicants had a valid case.

"There exist, for instance, entry quotas for whites at universities, and BEE policies restricting the hiring of white candidates in the private sector," said Eisenberg.

"If these measures could be interpreted to be state-sponsored or supported discrimination based on colour or race classification, for example, then a well-founded case of discrimination on those facts could be made in terms of the asylum rules of Western countries, such as the UK, Canada and the US."

But Eisenberg said it would be difficult for someone to apply for asylum on the basis that he felt that the state supported or sponsored the high levels of crime in the country.

Adriana Stuijt, a retired Dutch-born journalist who worked in South Africa, estimates that there are almost 800 South Africans living as refugees around the world.

Stuijt has a blog that monitors the number of refugees and is a member of the Afrikaner Rescue Action Fund, which was started in the Netherlands to help poor Afrikaner communities.

"The latest case, a South African Afrikaans-speaking man of German descent, is in north Germany. He applied three months ago. He fled because of many violent incidents and threats to his life," said Stuijt.

"The latest group of asylum-seekers, from 2011 and 2012, I find are often Afrikaner individuals or families, most of them from farming regions.

"Some are sponsored by US families and religious communities and are still in the asylum process in several states."

AfriForum's deputy CEO, Ernst Roets, said that though the organisation did not encourage South Africans to leave the country, the crisis on the farms has left many with no alternative .

Roets said San Pedro Sula, Honduras, has the highest murder rate in the world - 159 murders per 100000 inhabitants.

"In South Africa, to be a farmer, the murder rate is more than 300 per 100000, according to criminologists," said Roets.

"What encourages people to ask for refugee status is the fact that our government is not taking real steps to address the issue.''

Just this week, a dairy farmer was killed and his wife badly injured in Buffelshoek, North West.

Roets travelled to Geneva in December to address the UN Human Rights Council on the crisis on South African farms. He said the biggest concern was that a minority group was being targeted.

His intention, he said, was to create awareness and put pressure on the government to "take this more seriously".

But Lucy Holborn, research manager at the SA Institute of Race Relations, said statistics did not back up arguments that, by virtue of being a minority group, Afrikaners were more likely to be crime targets.

"The majority of victims of crime in South Africa are black . I often argue that crime is the one thing that cuts across all race groups," said Holborn.

She said there was not sufficient evidence to suggest that crime in farming communities was racially motivated.

Dave Steward, executive director of the FW de Klerk Foundation, said South Africa, despite "some threats" to basic human rights, such as the Protection of State Information Bill, was a long way from being in a situation where people should be seeking asylum.

"The situation on the farms [is] fairly critical but whether that is a result of government activity - often the requirement for political asylum - is another matter."

Yesterday, Home Affairs spokesman Ronnie Mamoepa said it was impossible to say how many South Africans made asylum or refugee applications.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

vatiekakie

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
I know many people would love to live in the US, but this family should find a better reason to apply for an American green card without making silly statements.
Avatar

UnderprivilegedOverprivileged

Posted 459 days ago
whiteness or western society has become so normalised and taken for granted by whites that other cultures and experiences have been marginalised to accommodate the dominant white norm. You can see this everyday when people of colour start talking about oppression and subjugation, there will always be whites who say "let's talk about something fun" or "let's not talk about racial inequality and white privilege. Even the language I'm speaking has been normalised. This is why white people view English as THE NORM when black people see it as a white language.

White culture is like the lawn of a garden and Chinese, African, and other cultures of colour are like the flowers of the garden. The white culture dominates the landscape while the cultures of colour continue to be marginalised and looked down upon. Over 90% of everyday activity takes place within the confines of the lawn but now and then we stop to “appreciate” the flowers on the side.
Avatar

ChickenRunner

Posted 458 days ago
So they lived in the USA as illegal immigrants and got caught, now they cry wolf? why did they not request this asylum from day one? send them back to South Africa - do not pass go....
Avatar

Annis

Posted 454 days ago
As a member of the founding stock of the United States of America, I can say with 100% certainty that Americans would love for WHITE South Africans to be able to come and live in America where they could be safe. These South Africans would soon assimilate into America and become wonderful, productive citizens just as they were in South Africa.

Unlike the hordes of non Whites that jews in our government are allowing to flood into our country. These non Whites are a low-IQ, non productive, welfare living, criminal element that is destroying Western civilization.

I cannot believe how the comments to this article reveal such hatred and disrespect for White people.

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
It would be very interesting to find out what skills these families that have been denied refugee status have. I ask coz those that have skills that are desired by their host countries all they do is just apply for jobs and they get them without having to apply for refugee statuses. After having worked for a certain number of years in those countries all they do is follow the proper channels to apply for citizenships.

My take is that this family might have skills that the US really doesn’t want just like Canada doesn’t want irrigation specialists like Mr Brandon Huntley :-).
Avatar

RaceCardCard

Posted 458 days ago
The self hatred in the black community (particular among black females) is so prevalent due to the deliberate actions of the agents of white supremacy who shaped this white supremacist culture and induces black self hated. This is why we bleach our skin, straighten our hair and hate our African features because white supremacy has thoroughly colonized our minds. Then whites will say that black self hatred is not the result of this racist society but that there is something wrong with us black people. The agents of white supremacy hide the ways they integrate their influences into the society and pin the result on the subjects
Avatar

RaceCardCard

Posted 458 days ago
Balls 1-15 should unite against racism / white supremacy, the numberless ball. People of colour should unite against racism. Blacks, coloreds and Indians should stop fighting each other and focus on the real problem: racism / white supremacy which is being maintained by everyday white people! Don't let whitey's divide and conquer games fool you!

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
This is just sad. How does someone run away from their homeland and then make up wild excuses not to go back? I have no problem with people leaving for greener pastures but I very much resent their attempts to drag my country's good name through the mud.

On a lighter note, much of Huntley's 'evidence' is actually from the comments section of this very newspaper. Probably why the editor now thinks we cannot be trusted with commenting without censorship.
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
Howzit Momma?

Eish I really wonder if the pastures are really greener as they claim them to be :-).

Stas that have been come out from ACSA, Shipping companies etc suggest that there are more people coming back to SA than those leaving. What I find strange is that those coming back don't announce their return as much as when they did when they were leaving telling us all sorts of wara wara what what things :-).
Avatar

the_original_MommaCyndi

Posted 459 days ago
Hey there PSG :)

The grass is always greener on the other side. Mainly due to the amount of manure it has.
Avatar

l984

Posted 459 days ago

"much of Huntley's 'evidence' is actually from the comments section of this very newspaper"

Oh? That says a lot, and also explains a lot.
Avatar

ZA_Mercenaries_Ltd

Posted 459 days ago
"...country's good name..."

ROFLMFWAO!!! Thanks Mom. :o)
Avatar

dunesurfer

Posted 458 days ago
You see dear. Some of us can think for ourselves and dig deeper. Once you do, you would discover the BS most of the newspaper feeds you are not even true, but half-truths. Most people are still naive to think newspapers will give them enough information in order to plan their lives. How naive can one be? Reading here. Seems quite a lot of sheeple out there.
Avatar

GrahamJ

Posted 458 days ago
THIS is the reason we should let them stay away:

From our deeply flwed constitution, section 9 EQUALITY:

...(3) The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.
(4) No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3). National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.
(5) Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair.

I repeat, "unless it is established that the discrimination is fair."

And who has used this clause to enact racial legislation to deprive white people of equality? Why, the ANC government, of course.

AA, BEE, BBBEE and the ignoring of white farm killings etc, are all based on what the ANC regards as 'fair' discrimination.

But fair discrimination is like fair capital punishment. You either have it or you don't, there is no 'fair' discrimination', an argument that the ANC used to vociferously argue before the NATS ended apartheid in 1989.

Now it's 'OK' to use 'fair' discrimination against white employees, farmers or specialists. Someone should tell the world...
Avatar

ray24

Posted 458 days ago
@ Graham
So was apartheid fair?
Your probable response:Two wrongs dnt make a right
My Response : I agree with you, however how are we going to equal the playing field that whites received from Apartheid, if not for a mechanism that advantages non-whites?

Secondly our highly "flawed constitution" that you eluded to is actually regarded as one of the best in the world. I stand to be corrected but I believe the dutch and Canadian constitutions are the only ones regarded as being more fair.
Avatar

ray24

Posted 457 days ago
Lol I cant believe ,you actually believe what you wrote, no point in continuing the rest of this argument. Hopefully you find a some peace living in a country ruled predominantly by black people.
Avatar

GrahamJ

Posted 457 days ago
Actually, I stay for the weather. The racism is of no consequence for me because I cannot change it, so I put up with it.

That doesn't make it right, though. So thanks, I'll stay.
Avatar

AnotherTaxPayer

Posted 457 days ago
In my opinion I can understand why some white South African farmers are fleeing the country. If you look at the level of violence associated with farm killings it's hard not to see that robbery or theft was ever a motive as most of the times nothing but cell phones or cars are stolen. But then those killings go hand in hand with rape and torture that makes them politically and racially motivated.

I just wish that people would realize that in killing only 1 farmer you actually kill 100+ jobs every time and more maze needs to be imported from the West in order to meet the demand. Hence a higher price for bread. It's like shooting holes into your own boat while you sit in it....very stuped.
Avatar

tj-boel.ferreira

Posted 323 days ago
You call this sad, you're right it's sad, it's sad when the president of a country sings a song that calls for the killing of whites. It's sad when white christians are being killed daily and the world finds that okay. That country, which incidently is also my country has no good name, as you claim and thus cannot be dragged through the mud. It's leadership is doing it for the country.
You tell eavery farmer and that has been tortured and slaughtered in the past few years that the murders is a fictation of his mind. Unfortunately you'll have to stand at his gravestone, to tell him that.

As far as I am concerned, I will do all I can to assist those who wishes to leave that evil place. I will testify in every court of my adopted country, to the truth of the situation in South Africa. I will play video's, show facts of murders and do everything I can, to ensure that, that dark hole receives the rejection it so sorely deserves

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Whites are complaining that the BEE laws outlaws them and relegate them to a position of B Class. This is far from the truth; the BEE laws are the legislation that Mandela promised at the CODESA negotiations to ensure that blacks feel like something is done for them and not give blacks a reason for violence.

The BEE laws work for whites; it’s all part of the grand design. The whites are fulfilling their part of the agreement by complaining so that blacks will think ‘shame they are having it hard out there’. Whites are many times better off today than 1994; they enjoy more security, more social stability, more education, less unemployment (unemployment in the white community sits at around 8%, blacks = 29-32%).

iGeorge_S

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Ag please. If you want out then stay out, we dont need your kind in our beautiful country.

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
I know there are poor white people out there but I have never seen them poor in the same scale as Black South Africans. If Blacks were considered human by the UN; then what is happening in SA would be considered a crisis, a crime to humanity and global relief would be sought.
Avatar

AnotherTaxPayer

Posted 457 days ago
Right lets follow the African path. Let the UN and food organizations look after the people while in the mean time the top Dictators enrich themselves and over protect themselves against other freedom fighters who also want a ticket to ride the money train.
This is the same trend over and over in Africa.

ppss

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Gee, Horus, and your statement is based on what evidence?
Avatar

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Good question. Let's drive to Alexandra township this afternoon. Let's go to Ermelo (Mpumalanaga) tomorrow and look the utter hopelessness these people have to live in. Let's go to my own family; where just 2 years ago we were all unemployed. All six of us.

WinKuppers

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Mr.Horus, you better take off your rose-tinted glasses. The BEE laws are the most racialistic political manoeuvre in the whole world .. nothing more racist than BEE has ever been devised by anybody anywhere. To say that BEE works FOR the Whites is the ultimate travesty of a statement or opinion, and the claim that Whites today enjoy more security, stability and education obviously stems from someone who's been fast asleep during the last 18 years. You really and seriously need help, mister! I have never heard such trash in my whole life. Anti-white discrimination and legislation in South Africa has reached such disastrous proportions that it makes perfect sense for many countries to open their doors to white SA asylum seekers. And mark my words .. it won't be long before some of you commenters here-above will join the queue of deperate emigrants because this country is going only one way, and that is certainly not Mandela's way.
Avatar

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
If the BEE laws are such racist then the Apartheid laws were pure evil. It shows how soft you guys are. A slight manoeuvre by black people to get out of the hole you stuffed them in is taken as utter racist.

A black man driving a BMW 750i is a total discrimination against whites, and a black man wearing a clean shirt is total disrespect to you. Clearly you have never visited the areas where blacks live. You have never seen the rottenness in Alexandra, not too far from the Alexandra Forbes head offices.
Avatar

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Very true Timbuck5. The only evil this country will regret is the white elephant called the ANC.
Avatar

GeneralSpecific

Posted 459 days ago
WinKuppers, I do not understand your logic, it appears as though efforts to correct the past imbalances cause by the draconian rules of apatheid are racist to you, at least that was what BEE and AA were meant to correct. The other issue is despite all these efforts economic wealth still rest with white South Africans. Until I see with my own two eyes a white domestic worker or petrol attendant would my opinion change.

Burkyz_2012

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
The Apartheid generation must go! Let them go...for democracy and non racialism to work in this country. Many afrikaaner have not come to term to accept that thing can not work the way they used to work. Under the racist government they had every thing easy, even their churches thought them that God gave them everything in this country even the people they found here to use and they beleive that.
I leaved overseas as a black South African for a while, and experienced racism and discrimination in country like France or Germany...etc,you deal with a different type of racism or discrimination all together...
the Afrikaaner type of racism trend more toward jelousy as it is a competition of distribution of wealth that the country has. The apartheid system programmed most of them to beleive other race cannot be egal to them or compete on an equal footing.
South africa has a long way to go and I will say it once again the Apartheid generation must disappear for our democracy to succeed


Avatar

IngridDenzin

Posted 458 days ago
Totally agree with you. Do you know who this Dutch-born journalist Adriana Stuijt is and what her politics are? She was twice married to Boer nationalist Robert van Tonder who argued for a Boer state within South Africa. She's about the same age as Mugabe.

Spitfire

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Silly statement??? South Africa is now one of the worst black racist countries in the world. The ANC have legalised discrimination against all whites with their racist BEE policy. We were forced to sell shares in our company or lose government business. We were forced to appoint black directors simply because they were black and who contribute little to the company!!BEE is black racism of the worst kind and cannot be justified. If one compares South Africa to what happened after the Holocaust in Germany and the mass slaughter of westerners by the Japanese, Jews were not given preference for jobs in Germany and neither were westerners or other race groups in Japan. Yet 17 years after the end of apartheid, young whites, who had nothing to do with apartheid, are still being victimised and suffering crippling career prospects under the ANCs racist BEE policies. How can it be civilised or morally acceptable to punish children for something their parents MAY have done? How on earth can this be acceptable??? Imagine the outcry if Germans in Germany were forced by legislation to sell shares in their businesses to Jews, or appoint them to senior/director positions!!! Or if the Japanese were forced to implement a Westerner's Empowerment Policy!! It really seems like South Africa has swopped a white racist government for a black racist government! BEE is completely wrong and may well be considered a crime against humanity by international standards and the precedents set by the benign treatment of the Germans and Japanese. It is time for those with a moral conscience to speak up. Not even the most morally bankrupt ANC politician can justify this hideous, black racists legislation. No wonder white people want to escape from this racist hell hole.
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
Hi there Spitfire.

There is nothing wrong with BEE, implimentation of the policy is the problem. BEE is necessary to correct the injustices that happened in the past. I'm a firm believer that skilled and competent people should be put in those positions. The problem is that those skilled and competent black people are not card carrying members of certain political parties :-).

I akcnowledge that you were put in a corner by being told that you should be BEE compliant in order to continue benefitting from Government tenders. In my view if you didn't have any opportion but to comply you should atleast have stood your ground and told them that you'd select your own competent person that you believed would add value.

You claim that BEE discriminated against all white. Well do you know that white females have benefited the most out of the BEE "AA/EE" policy as they are deemed previously disavantaged and get higher rating more than any male :-).
Avatar

Spitfire

Posted 459 days ago
So PSG, you believe that it is right to punish young whites for something they were not responsible for??? How many generations will this continue for??? Whichever way you look at it - BEE is sick, perverted black racism of the worst kind. It is without doubt a crime against humanity.
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
So PSG, you believe that it is right to punish young whites for something they were not responsible for???

-No i’m not saying it is right to punish young whites for something that they are not responsible for. Racism in SA isn’t dead let’s not think for one minute that it is dead. People from both sides of teh fence ar still racist.

The problems that we still see in this country are predominantly problems that were created by what used to happen. This is a fact and it is a generational

How many generations will this continue for???
-I don’t have an answer to this but our Government should have taken a lead on this and set time lines as to by year so and so we should have been here in terms of eradicating problems of our past but no it is too busy with enriching itself.

Whichever way you look at it - BEE is sick, perverted black racism of the worst kind. It is without doubt a crime against humanity.
-Let’s say I agree with your view that BEE is racism of the worst kind, what would apartheid be?

My question is since you deem BEE to be racist what alternative do you suggest? Equal opportunities wouldn't cut it coz those that are already ahead in the game will always be steps ahead this includes children of people like Mr Sexwale, Mr Ramaphosa etc.
Avatar

Spitfire

Posted 459 days ago
PSG - Interesting response - the alternative to BEE is no BEE! And of course it is as bad if not worse than apartheid ever was. In real terms it has done little for the mass of black people and is really just a spiteful political tit-for-tat. It is tantamount to saying that if your neighbour rapes your wife - is it OK to go and rape his! It is worth bearing in mind that "social engineering" has failed wherever it has been attempted in the world. Communism collapsed, apartheid failed and multi-culturalism has torn the UK and Europe apart. The American equivalent of BEE has done little to relieve poverty amongst black communities. Free enterprise on the other hand has delivered more to people than any social engineering by agenda driven and vote hungry governments. South Africa is at a tipping point where the number of people working in private enterprise is now far exceeded by those enjoying free health care, education, child grants etc. The situation is unsustainable - no doubt taxes will increase which will only encourage more entrepeneurs to leave and businessmen to relocate their businesses. The ANC took the wrong economic road when they came to power - following the failed policies of socialism and communism rather than the free enterprise models of the east. Sadly it is probably too late to reverse the process which is why most folks I know, including many blacks, have immigration on their agenda simply to escape the pending revolution.
Avatar

ray24

Posted 458 days ago
Mind my butting in, but i completely disagree with your statements.Firstly BEE/BBBEE/AA or whatever it is being called now is something that is needed in this country to level the playing field which apartheid so callously distorted. However. saying that i dnt think that BEE is helping the majority of disadvantaged people in its current implementation, but i do believe that a properly implemented strategy ( no tenderpreneuring) will uplift the poor.

Secondly, you refer to germany and japan in your argument, what you fail to realize is that the native Germans and Japanese made up the majority of the population in those countries, in germany most of the Jews who were not exterminated , fled the country and never returned, those who did returned were entitled to compensation, so i am not sure where are you getting your info from ?

Also germany and japan where held financial responsible for the war , I stand to be corrected but germany had to pay 23 billion dollars and japan had to pay 1.3 trillion Yen to allies as well as to countries that they decimated during the war. What have the benefactors of apartheid been held responsible for?

The ANC government that we have now is by no means perfect , in fact one could easily argue the merits of their incompetence. However to suggest their policies are equivalent to that of apartheid is disingenuous at best. I'm trying not to label you as a racist as I do not know you at all, but your Andries Treurnicht-esque rhetoric suggest you are!
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 458 days ago
Spitfire

You are really spitting fire without looking at other aspects the current situations in South Africa. To start with, BEE like AA was not started in South Africa. The first implementation of Affirmative Action was in the United States in the year 1961. These policies would be implemented whether you like it. They address the imbalances caused by the past evil system, not to punish anyone.
Your comparison of the current situation in SA to that of Germany is totally unfounded.

If you can refer to the below current unemployment indications in SA you might need to recall your first comments:

Unemployment rate per race

White : 6,4 %
Indian : 10,1 %
Coloured : 22,5 %
Black/African : 29,5 %

Judging from above indicators, you will agree with me that whites are most benefiting from the current system. In addition, whites continue to receive better salaries and occupy better positions than blacks. So how do you explain this?

Avatar

darkie2

Posted 458 days ago
Honestly!!! how about all those who have issues with blacks in South Africa, just go!!!
do yourselves that favour, coz clearly the issue here is with black people more than anything.
GOD should punish the whole lot really, you complain for ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. have you seen the porvety experienced by black people, living in shacks, dumps, homeless, kids going to bed without food, have you been screaming about that NO...because it's happening to the black child therefore it does not affect you & its not your problem.......JUST BE GREATFUL & SHUT UP!....COZ TRUST ME YOU HAVE NOT HAD IT BAD AT ALL!!!! BLACK PEOPLE HAVE HAD SINCE BIRTH BECAUSE OF APARTEID, NEVER HAD THE PRIVILAGES YOUR CHILDREN HAD, SO PLEASE STOP BEING PETTY, THERE ARE REAL DIFFICULT & HORRIFYING ISSUES OUT THERE THAT YOU WOULDNT SURVIVE A DAY IF YOU HAD TO GO THROUGH THEM. SO SHUT UP! OR JUMP ON A PLANE OR SHIP TO AMERICA OR WHEREVER YOU'LL FEEL COMFORTABLE & IN CONTROL.....
Avatar

gareth22

Posted 458 days ago
Well said
Avatar

GrahamJ

Posted 458 days ago
The simple fact is that black people under aparheid had a much better standard of living than black people under any other sub-saharan government. Except Rhodesia. Until 1980.

Now we are frozen in time and society is decaying quickly. It is time to get rid of that silly constitutional clause: "(5) Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair."

As long as someone, ANYONE, can decide what is 'fair' discrimination and what is not 'fair' discrimination, then this country is going nowhere. This is a crime against humanity.

The matric results confirm.
Avatar

JorgenHus

Posted 374 days ago
Afrikaner people might consider countries like Chile as an alternative to North America or Western Europe where they seem to be unwanted. The process of obtaining Chilean residence is pretty straight forward and there is a reputable law office (SpencerGlobal.com) which helps with the process for a very reasonable fee.
Avatar

TaniaSteyn

Posted 321 days ago
The Media and everything else was controlled by the Government of the time - most Whites had no clue of what was happening in the rest of the World. The status quo remains - many South Africans are clueless about the situation in Europe, India, South America - and believe they are the only people suffering in poverty. By keeping your electorate dumb, and making them believe that the "Whites" are the enemy, (The elusive Third Force) - the ANC is replicating the behaviour of their previous "Massas". Geez, thanks. We still remain cannon fodder, whether Black or White.

SuiGeneris

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Moderators should ALWAYS be impartial about comments !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Truth is heresy. We all know whites are having a ball in SA. But let's keep this open secret hush hush for now.
Avatar

SuiGeneris

Posted 459 days ago
'''''''''Truth is heresy'''''''''

You must be the only one in the world who believes this !!!

Horus

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
If this comment service was about Malema and the stupidity of black people, then trust me we'd see 95 comments. None would be deleted. Even the most insulting would still be flashing. You go freedom of speech.
Avatar

Duzula

Posted 459 days ago
My point right there...
@TL
Can you just close this comment stuff down so that we can just read NEWS only, cause if we are speaking your minds you just delete your comments

Gurdjieff

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Has the spelling for "Afrikaaner" changed over-night to "Afrikaner"? Jeez no wonder they want to leave even their name is short-changed.
Avatar

vatiekakie

Posted 459 days ago
broer, you must be confusing the language with the people, Afrikaners have always been Afrikaners and their language is Afrikaans (the only part that has to "As")

Duzula

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
@TL
What point are you trying to prove, now i just hope this information Bill can come sooner... AVUSa why did you allow people to comment but at the end you delete their comment this is not on... FREE the internet
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
Holla Duzula.

They are proving a point that freedom of speech is selective :-).
Avatar

Duzula

Posted 459 days ago
Seletive to who? to us
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
You got it. To us skhokho :-).

Government wants to pass the Protection of Information Act and they cry freedom of speech, freedom of the press yet they are the ones deleting our none racial posts that conform to the posting of comments guidelines.

How hypocritical :-).
Avatar

Duzula

Posted 459 days ago
@PSG
tell you what, I didn't like the Government Protection of Information Act but Now i just hope that it can Pass so that all the media including the TL can feel what we are feeling right NOW about deleting your comments...
@ TL
you can delete even this one so that you can prove your point!

letslisten

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
@TL & PSG - It is obvious from whence you came.
As to the skills of these Afrikaners you referring to the following:
It is a fact that MANY of the Pakistani & Indians and for that matter, African immigrants that are in America are there illegally, and those who are there legally have very little qualifications to write home about either.
And TL, your prayers for the information bill to become law is regrettable and proof of your total lack of common sense and intelligence.
America, the land of the free - should not entertain the wishes and the demands of people like yourself.
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
@ Letslisten, Hi there :-).

You posted "@TL & PSG - It is obvious from whence you came." I don't follow can you please unpack this for me?

letslisten

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
@Kurjieff - The correct spelling for Afrikaner is "AFRIKANER" No such a thing as "AFRIKAANER"

letslisten

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
@ PSG - I am not surprised at all!.
Avatar

PSG

Posted 459 days ago
Ok, I'm seriously trying to engage with you in a very friendly manner.

I seriously don't follow what you wrote there. I'd rather ask than assume that I know what you mean or meant but if you don't want to elaborate than I don't undestand whay you would want to respond to my earlier post.

paulth82

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
Ya ne. You know the sad thing about it is that the americans have bigger problems to worry about than these people that spit their pacifiers or throw their toys. The twisted part about it is that some actually believe by acting up they will make the whole world take notice of the percieved injustices that are happening in South africa and it will be on CNN, BBC etc. So sad indeed. America is actually not so rosy itself don't these and many minority South Africans read the news, America and Europe are much much worse than South Africa. But anyway good riddens.

inkunzi

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
What a bunch of lazyass Afrikaners. They must up-skill themselves and the US economy will absorb them. I have friends and family that work and live in the US. Guess what, two of them are CFA's (working for Morgan Stanley and Bank of America) and the other is a specialist surgeon working for a government hospital in Minnesota. Farming is not a scarce skill in the US.
Also, they need to educate themselves. The unemployment rate among white S. Africans is around 9% where for black S.Africans is around 25%. Who's worse off in South Africa??
Avatar

MissColtrane

Posted 458 days ago
Shame, now they have to learn to speak English...

paulth82

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
It just goes to prove that it’s only those minorities that have boxed themselves into a corner by not being educated enough. I guess also Afrikaans in not such a celebrated language in the US either talk about lack of forward thinking, they did not think about that when they decided to use their Afrikaans as a medium of education. They thought they would rule South Africa forever. In America is not about your skin colour you must earn your stripes. This article is actually embarrassing we don't need them here in Msansi and nobody else wants them. Shame. Kwa-kwa-kwa. Ag sis tog let them come back we can always find something for them to do if they promise to humble themselves and lose their arrogance.

Smeegen

Posted 459 days ago
Avatar
You know, this whole 'you can leave' attitude is just plain daft.
If, as you say, whites own most of the wealth in SA, what happens if they do leave en masse?

30% of the population pays 80% of the income tax. The same income tax that pays for the grants that 15 million people live off in SA (Almost a third of the populace!).
Yes, it is true that the emerging black middle class is growing fast, but, fast enough to compensate for the loss of tax revenue if the whites left?

Yes, whites form only 8% of the population, so they aren't paying all the tax. That is a given. But the burden would have to be shifted to another demographic if they gave up their citizenship and residence in SA. Rest assured, they won't leave their money here for the state to spend. Companies would close. Jobs would be lost. Tax income would drop...

Today's white South African has to think around BBBEE. Look how many small business they are starting up in this country. They no longer want to grow them into large corporations, because once you employ more than 49 staff, you have to conform to AA/BEE.
And honestly, who wants to do business with government? I certainly don't. I prefer to actually get paid for the services I render.

Now let us consider for a moment this other silly idea... 'we will attack the whites and take what they have!'
Yeah, right... Historically, the whites in Africa, when attacked, have uprooted, and moved south, because theya ren't bellicose by nature. Many of them, now resident in SA, have nowhere left to go. They are not eligible to emigrate to Europe, etc. so they have to stay put. If you corner an animal, and poke at it with a stick, what happens? It will fight back.
Do you really want to start a racially-based conflict in SA? Once more, bombs in restaurants and churches, toxins/bacteria in water resevoirs...? Who will suffer most from that? Militants? No. The innocent peaceful people caught in the cross fire.
The idiots that believe taking by force is the answer is a tiny minority compared to the number that want a peaceful solution to the problems in SA. I back the latter, but don't poke me with a stick! I'll come out fighting.
Avatar

Smeegen

Posted 458 days ago
I'm not worried.
I have a British passport, and offshore accounts.
Avatar

inkunzi

Posted 458 days ago
@ Smeegen,
you said:If, as you say, whites own most of the wealth in SA, what happens if they do leave en masse?

Look, the ones that make headlines are the ones that own very little wealth here. The real owners of wealth are staying put. They have investments they can't afford to just abandon. The ones that are leaving en masse are the ones I also say they can leave. A qualified actuary would not have a problem getting an American green card, believe me. These are just farm basses or mechanics who think they are special.

AlecC

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar

Don't blame that family. Whites have been sidelined and are not allowed to play a part in the running of the country and it's infrastructure.

Avatar

Black-Moses

Posted 458 days ago
Not all whites have been sidelined, there are thousands of whites who feel at home in South Africa. All i can say to ''that family'' is..thanks for going for good.

vatiekakie

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
I hear a lot of intellectually challenged statements like "whites can go we don't need them" and "if whites go, the economy will crumble". both statements are untrue and just plain dumb. firstly South Africa needs all its people to prosper. Secondly it's not whites who contribute most of the tax but multinationals (big business), and multinational are not about white pride but just dirty old money. they will not pull out of a country just because whites were leaving, they are here for the money and they make the bulk of their money from blacks, who are in the majority. big business wouldn't survive if they only sold their products to whites. we wouldn't have your Pick n Pay, Checkers, OK, Spar, Edgars, Jet, Ellerines etc if without black money. even far stores wouldn't survive without money from farmworkers and locals. that's why the directors of these stores have not attempted to launch them in the US or UK for instance.

matlhabaEuric

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Perhaps, in the greater scheme of things, try imagine a man who would leave his house due to a structural defect without a decent attempt to fix such defect. could you truly consider him a man in the true essence of the word?

To add to Vatiekakie's contention: if we as Africans cannot appraise ourselves of our true worth, we avail ourselves to Imperial domination. As a collective we need to understand that part our cause to humanity is the ability to understand the need for our different contributions towards a better South Africa, for instance we need land, funding, architects, project manager, bricklayer, rabble remover, and a cleaner to build and maintain a school to educate our children. without any of the mentioned persons you can't have the school.

we cannot prosper without the other, Coucasians should stop thinking they doing any person a favour by being in SA and equally Africans should stop thinking they don't need Coucasians.

Ultimate

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
I have the article with great interest, i currently market an EB-5 investment US visa to South Africans here locally, and have been approached by a number of farmers, who consider this investment as an mechanism to facilitate immigration for them selves and their family to the USA.
The reality is that this trend will continue
Stuart Ferguson

Maxi

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Spitfire

You are really spitting fire without looking at other aspects the current situations in South Africa. To start with, BEE like AA was not started in South Africa. The first implementation of Affirmative Action was in the United States in the year 1961. These policies would be implemented whether you like it. They address the imbalances caused by the past evil system, not to punish anyone.
Your comparison of the current situation in SA to that of Germany is totally unfounded.
If you can refer to the below current unemployment indications in SA you might need to recall your first comments:

Unemployment rate per race

White : 6,4 %
Indian : 10,1 %
Coloured : 22,5 %
Black/African : 29,5 %

Judging from above indicators, you will agree with me that whites are most benefiting from the current system. In addition, whites continue to receive better salaries and occupy better positions than blacks. So how do you explain this?
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 458 days ago
KarenPerks_Woodward
I am not sure of your findings, but still the government compared to the private sector, employs a small fraction of people. Maybe only 18% percent if I am not mistaken.

I am not disputing the fact that poor people cannot send their many children to school. I was just making a wake up call to Spitfire that whites continue to have more privileges in the current society. He was talking whites experiencing the worst situation than that experience by holocaust victims. Do you agree with me or prefer to continue disagreeing with me?

darkie2

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
If it werent for these BEE laws there would be no black people working in private companies, IT'S A FACT & YA'LL KNOW IT. So please lets not petronise each other up in here, acting like we dont know that private cooperates which are predominantly white owned dont only higher black people just to improve their BEE ratings. This playing victim by the white people is just putiing up a show for the rest of the world really, they are the most racist even post 1994. Interesting how they dont see a problem when an entity hires only white people, but the minute the BEE laws are introduced its a problem. BEE is giving us black people a chance to be part of the predominantly white corporate world, which we would never get had it not been for these BEE laws. However ya'll seem to scream when something seems to favour black people as well, because ya'll still believe that the world belongs to white people. For some reason only white people should have the rights to anything & it annoys the leaving h*ll out of you to see those rights shared amongst the black people.
Avatar

GrahamJ

Posted 457 days ago
I would agree with you, darkie2, if BEE promoted competence and capability. But it doesn't. It promotes black skin. That's all.

When there are 26500 white CAs and less than 100 BEE CAs, how does insisting I have a black CA help me when they are like hens teeth?

And THAT is a crime against humanity.

Spitfire

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Ray24 I wondered how long it would be before someone started yelling hysterically " RACIST RACIST" and throwing all logic out of the window! Stick to the discussion and refrain from schoolyard name calling old chap! And Maxi nowhere did I compare what whites are going through in South Africa to the holocaust - please read my posts more carefully. The point I made was that the holocaust was far worse than apartheid - but that the Germans were never punished on an individual level. It seems that in your minds, it is quite right, legitimate and moral that a young white person can be punished ON AN INDIVIDUAL LEVEL for something a previous generation did? Good heavens - does this black racism then carry on to grandchildren and future generations?? To suggest that reparations that countries made after WWII black is equivalent to racist BEE which is dehumanising and conflicts with an individual's basic human rights is absolute nonsense. BEE cruelly punishes white people and white owned businesses on an individual level and this certainly did not happen in either Germany or Japan and is a matter of public record. However he comparisons with Germany in the 1930's are indeed most apt - in the early thirties Jewish businesses suffered greatly and it was hard for young Jews to find employment - a situation very similar to young whites here in South Africa. Of course the treatment of Jews became much harsher as the war progressed and there are reasons to suspect the same could happen here given what happened in Zimbabwe and the high murder rate of white farmers. Once racial discrimination is legitimised by law it is but a small step to genocide. Your statement that all the Jews had left Germany is completely incorrect. There were many Jews, Poles, Hungarians, Gypsies in Germany after WWII and there is no single instance of ANY of these people being given preference over Germans. The affirmative action policies in the USA cannot in any way be compared with those of South Africa which are far, far harsher on white people. No one can defend white racist apartheid or black racist BEE - they are other sides of the same coin and only serve to create generations of young people angry with their oppressors. The fact is that BEE has failed the very people it was supposed to uplift. It focusses completely on the negative on the mistaken belief that by dispossessing one person you can uplift another. This perverted thinking has failed everywhere in the world it has been tried. Only a free and open society, based on the principles of free-enterprise can succeed. The lessons of the far east are there for all who want to see - if they will only unblinker their eyes and give up obsession with "how well white people have done."
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 458 days ago
Spitfire
Are you for real? Are you currently living in South Africa? Can you explain to me how are young white people are punished by the current system? After giving you the above unemployment indications, which race is well off when it comes to employment?
Also can you explain to me how are whites business affected by BEE? According to latest findings, whites are still dominating in the business sector. We have an open market in SA, so I do not understand how a white owned business can be affected by BEE. It was proven recently that the major shareholders in the JSE continue to be whites.
So please I still do not understand how young white people are punished. I continue to see new white staff joining my company which is already dominated by white staff. The number of black staff is reducing. So I doubt if you are really living in SA or maybe you are sticking your head under the sand?

ComradeChe

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
One racist Boer family less is better for MY country. I wish another 10 million of them could do the same, then all our problems will be gone with them, the stinking racists.

gareth22

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
South Africa is on genocide watch.

There IS therefore a basis to consider their allegations. Is that not enough evidence for Laumann and his ridiculous 'scholorly' statements?

I hope this issue brings forward the fact that people are being murdered.

There is no way you can justify this.

fromseattlewa

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Please read what the head master of Fish Hoek High School says about SA in the ECHO 1/12/11 about being ASHAMED of South Africa because of its corruption,crime and re-racialisation.
I am ALSO ASHAMED of South Africa and as I am living in the USA will contact and support any South Africans seeking asylum in this country.
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 458 days ago
Please recruit as many people like you to leave our country and join you there. The more South Africa rid itself of people like you the more its rightful people will become well-off.

fromseattlewa

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
ANC worse than apartheid govt: Tutu

Sapa | 04 October, 2011

fromseattlewa

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Hey MAXI....Bishop Tutu's family live in the USA if memory serves me but judging what he feels about SA and the ANC's government he would probably agree that many should leave SA just to have you and the" rigtful" have the spoils or whatever is left when the wealth has been divided amongst the corrupt. Why dont you ask why the learned Bishop has not a good word for the ANC? Examine your own situation and ask what you have gained from the ANC and how have you achieved your status?

Read what Thabo Mbeki's brother has to say about the new SA.

Spitfire

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Maxi - with all due respect it seems you have not read or understood my posts. I would love to enter into a debate with you, but if you do not read what I have written - it becomes difficult. My fist post made it clear that we were FORCED to sell shares in our business to black people in order to conduct business with government, otherwise they would not purchase our products. We were also forced to appoint black directors - who draw large salaries but do little to grow the company. I have many friends who's children have been rejected for employment simply because they are white. As one young white youngster said to me, " Do I really have to sacrifice my career simply because I am white. What have I done do be treated this way? Does being born white make me a criminal???" Now if you believe this is morally right then I have a serious problem with your ability to determine justice, equality and fairness. If just one person in our society suffers discrimination because of their colour without recourse then the system is perverted and morally unjustifiable. Employment statistics mean nothing - if you look across Africa you will find that the employment rate of whites is almost 100% whilst that for blacks is miniscule. This in countries that have been independent and governed by blacks for over 50 years! What this demonstrates is not the weasel cry of RACISM, but the failure of black governments to deliver policies that grow the economy and create jobs. To legalise black racism through BEE shows that the leadership of this country is morally bankrupt. They have no answers - only negative actions against a small minority who happen to be white. By any definition BEE is a crime against humanity. And for the record, I am a 3rd generation South African who hoped that there would be a new generation that was non-racial. Sadly that was not to be. we have merely replaced white bigotry with black bigotry. That should make anyone want to throw up.

Argo

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar

@AlecC.
Moderator.................Oh and by the way. Why block AlecC from commenting on this site? Can we only express opinions that you agree with? Does the truth really bug you so much? Or don't you want people to discuss what really is happening in SA on this forum?

We have time and again asked very nicely that people should keep to the subject, no personal attacks on individuals, tribes or races, no hate speech. When you guys don't play ball, you leave us with only one option. MOD

Anti_Propaganda

Posted 458 days ago
Avatar
Behr - who is an award-winning South African author - said he did not believe the law firm would find "any fair-minded scholar" to support the family.

"If the people your firm seeks to represent are in any way victims of racism, it is, sadly, only a racism of their own making, in their own minds.


I agree 100%.

They caused it, let them suffer for it. One of life's greatest sayings and a way to live " DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU" I say voetsek to all the other Afrikaners that think like this family as kudos to the professors and others that agree with them.
We need to better this country and by doing that I mean WE need to learn to live TOGETHER!!!! Even if that means cutting out the "bad apples" from our society.... The greater good is of omportance than a few insecure, irrational and unlearned indocrinated neandathal Afrikaner scum!!!

AMANDLA!!!