• All Share : 48569.57
    DOWN -0.62%
    Top 40 : 3979.02
    DOWN -0.58%
    Financial 15 : 14083.71
    DOWN -0.67%
    Industrial 25 : 57544.87
    DOWN -0.51%

  • ZAR/USD : 11.1840
    DOWN -0.68%
    ZAR/GBP : 18.1125
    DOWN -0.59%
    ZAR/EUR : 14.1200
    DOWN -0.61%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.1030
    DOWN -0.18%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.8345
    UP 0.02%

  • Gold : 1215.5500
    UP 0.22%
    Platinum : 1284.5000
    UP 0.65%
    Silver : 17.1700
    UP 0.02%
    Palladium : 780.5000
    UP 0.71%
    Brent Crude Oil : 92.870
    DOWN -1.37%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by INET BFA
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Thu Oct 02 10:32:22 SAST 2014

Maladministration in justice department: Madonsela

Sapa | 07 February, 2013 13:14

A report by Public Protector Thuli Madonsela has found there was maladministration in the justice department regarding the treatment of a whistleblower.

The report, which was released on Thursday, concerned a complaint by a woman named in the report as "Mrs M", who had worked at a division of the KwaZulu-Natal High Court Master's office that dealt with children.

"The department's management failed to protect the complainant against victimisation from her superiors and fellow employees," Madonsela told reporters in Pretoria at the release of the report.

"[The department] ignored the issues reported by the complainant and failed to take action against employees implicated."

Madonsela said Mrs M approached her office in 2010 and alleged that she was victimised and harassed in the first few months of her employment after she discovered that fellow employees were misappropriating funds.

"She said that in some cases... funds were paid to non-existent beneficiaries," Madonsela said.

"In some cases empty envelopes were given to beneficiaries while officials within the Masters office kept the original checks."

Mrs M said she approached the Master and the department to tell them about the conduct of the employees, but no action was taken.

"Soon thereafter the wrongdoers started to harass her. By May 2006, two years into her job, Mrs M had suffered occupational stress due to the continued victimisation," Madonsela said.

"Medical practitioners said she should be transferred to another office of the department."

This was not done and in March 2012 the department stopped paying her salary. A conciliation process was held, together with officials from the office of the Public Protector, and it was agreed that she should be re-instated.

She was not re-instated after the process and the department denied it had agreed to.

On January 30 this year, the director general of the department agreed to re-instate Mrs M.

She would also be moved to another office in the department.

Madonsela said the agreement matched her recommendations in the report.

"I think the leadership of the department of justice is doing the right thing. I have already indicated that it is not about doing it [right] the first time, but it is about correcting human imperfections," she said.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.
Thu Oct 02 10:32:22 SAST 2014 ::