Three appear in court for Cape doctor's death

10 June 2013 - 15:49 By Sapa
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
The site where Dr. Louis Heyns' body was found on May 31, 2013, in Strand, South Africa. Heyns, a doctor at Tygerberg hospital, went missing following a visit to his brother and was found in a shallow grave one week later. File photo.
The site where Dr. Louis Heyns' body was found on May 31, 2013, in Strand, South Africa. Heyns, a doctor at Tygerberg hospital, went missing following a visit to his brother and was found in a shallow grave one week later. File photo.
Image: Leanne Stander

Three men appeared in the Somerset West Magistrate's Court on Monday in connection with the murder and robbery of Dr Louis Heyns.

Marthinus van der Walt, 33, his brother Sarel, 42, and Malmesbury businessman Juan Liedeman, 37, kept their heads down as they entered a packed Court Room A.

The brothers are accused of killing and robbing Heyns, while Liedeman faces charges for being found in possession of Heyns's stolen vehicle.

The body of the Stellenbosch University medical professor was found in a shallow grave in Strand two weeks ago.

Last week, the court granted a seven-day postponement to allow the director of public prosecutions to decide under which schedule the crimes fell.

Samantha Raphaels, for the State, said deputy director of public prosecutions Johannes Abraham Niehaus had signed a certificate stating the exact charges against Liedeman and the applicable criminal schedule.

She said a decision was made to charge him with both robbery as an accessory after the fact and defeating the ends of justice, schedule six offences.

William Booth, for Liedeman, objected to his client being charged as an accessory.

Raphaels explained the charge.

"An accessory after the fact implies not that you were on the scene, but that you assisted the perpetrators after the offences were committed by hiding away their crimes," she said.

Booth told the court that the State had failed to timeously inform him of the schedule of his client's offence, did not give him the schedule certificate, and failed to tell him on what grounds they were opposing bail.

"This is extremely unfair, prejudicial, and affects the bail hearing," he said.

Liedeman launched an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court last week to review the magistrate's decision to postpone the matter for a week, arguing that he should be granted bail before then.

He argued that his charges were not as serious as those of the brothers.

The application was denied on the basis that the court had abided by the Criminal Procedures Act regarding the postponement.

In the application, further details emerged about Liedeman's alleged involvement.

Niehaus said in an affidavit that Liedeman allegedly received help and information from a police officer.

"... After the applicant received the information from an officer in [the SA Police Service], the applicant proceeded to dismantle and destroy parts of the robbed vehicle," he said.

"Some parts were burned and other parts were discarded, and others hidden in a tanker on the premises of the applicant."

Western Cape police are questioning three more men, including a police officer, in connection with the crimes.

The matter continues.

subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now