'Less resourced and less costly Sexual Offences Courts model' prompts concern

18 May 2017 - 19:48 By TMG Digital
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Placards voicing the concerns of rape victims outside the High Court in Johannesburg.
Placards voicing the concerns of rape victims outside the High Court in Johannesburg.
Image: EPA/Kim Ludbrook via The Conversation

Organisations in the gender-based violence sector say they are shocked that the Department of Justice intends to investigate the possibility of reducing resources provided to sexual offences courts.

This announcement was made during the Deputy Minister of Justice’s keynote address at the launch of the Thembalethu Sexual Offences Court in George‚ on 15 May 2017‚ the organisations said in a statement on Thursday.

Sexual Offences Courts were scrapped from the South African criminal justice system‚ around 2008. However‚ due to civil society demand and escalating sexual violence against women and children‚ the specialised courts were reintroduced by an Act of parliament signed by the President in January 2014.

  • Fury, but no regrets, over 'rape' blacklistThe son of a prominent politician in Zimbabwe, a popular comedian, a journalist and several student leaders are among the 11 men publicly accused of rape at Rhodes University.

However‚ the groups said‚ the Deputy Minister on Wednesday announced that the “department finalised its partnership with Unicef to develop a less resourced and less costly Sexual Offences Courts Model”.

Kathleen Dey‚ national director of Rape Crisis Cape Town Trust‚ said‚ “We were deeply disappointed to learn about this move.

  • Cops 'turn back on rape'Ntombi is sleeping alongside her boyfriend when she hears noises at the door. Three of her boyfriend’s friends enter the room and take turns raping her repeatedly, while her boyfriend watches. She reports the case to the police and a medical examination proves that she was sexually assaulted.

Those activists and civil society organisations working in the sector were not consulted on the aims and intentions behind this partnership‚ and it is certainly not in keeping with the recommendations of the Task Team or what we have been promised in respect of the roll-out of these courts.

The recommended resources are all there for very specific reasons‚ directly linked to the needs of victims and improved conviction rates.” “Any plan to reduce the resources to Sexual Offences Courts fundamentally erodes and undermines the whole idea of bringing them back in the first place.

A decision was made to reintroduce these courts based on the appropriate model recommended in the Task Team report‚ civil society backed the idea‚ and law was passed for this to happen.

  • Sexual assault victim claims cops failed herA community worker watched helplessly as the man who sexually assaulted her gave her an "evil grin" while a policewoman, just metres away, allegedly refused to help her catch him.

It would be unacceptable for the state to now go half-way on implementation. They knew what it would cost when the decision was made‚” said Sanja Bornman of the Lawyers for Human Rights Gender Equality Programme. Alison Tilley‚ head of advocacy and special projects at the Open Democracy Advice Centre‚ said‚

“The courts are certainly under pressure as a result of the increasing levels of crime‚ and especially crime against women and children. Outrage about the level of violence continues to grow. The idea that courts will not use the most effective system we have for convictions and reducing secondary trauma even before it has actually been implemented is startling indeed.”

subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now