Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40855.89
    DOWN -2.34%
    Top 40 : 3351.01
    DOWN -3.17%
    Financial 15 : 11688.69
    DOWN -2.36%
    Industrial 25 : 46366.22
    DOWN -2.21%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5330
    DOWN -0.36%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4128
    UP 0.22%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3390
    UP 0.43%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0936
    UP 0.97%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.3015
    UP 0.49%

  • Gold : 1388.0800
    UP 1.45%
    Platinum : 1456.5000
    DOWN -0.58%
    Silver : 22.4350
    UP 0.73%
    Palladium : 742.5000
    UP 0.20%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.100
    DOWN -0.49%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Thu May 23 18:40:33 SAST 2013

Zuma: SA will support Palestine's UN bid

Times LIVE, Sapa, and Reuters | 20 September, 2011 00:42
President Jacob Zuma, his Finnish counterpart, Tarja Halonen, and former British prime minister Gordon Brown share a joke at the start of a meeting on global sustainability at the UN headquarters in New York yesterday.
Image by: ELMOND JIYANE/GCIS

President Jacob Zuma said last night that South Africa would support Palestine's quest for statehood at the UN this week.

"We are dealing with a people who don't have rights, and as a follow-up to UN human rights kind of condition and principle, I think they have to be given an opportunity because they have been blocked all the time.

"I think in their position I would do the same so that you move to a particular stage, and we will support that," the SABC quoted the president as saying.

Zuma, who is scheduled to address the UN general assembly tomorrow, also said South Africa was "open" to discussing Libya's future, but insisted on African Union participation.

"We do not want . the Libyan process to proceed without the AU participating. This is an AU member state," Zuma said.

He said South Africa was prepared to discuss the matter "properly in the UN" in the hope of finding a "clear resolution".

South Africa has repeatedly criticised Nato's military intervention in Libya and the way in which the UN resolution 1973 on a no-fly zone was implemented by allowing air strikes.

South Africa has refused to recognise the National Transitional Council, the war-torn country's current interim government.

Earlier yesterday, President Mahmoud Abbas said he was sticking to his plan to seek full UN membership for his Palestinian state, though "all hell had broken out" over the move, which has been opposed by both the US and Israel.

Abbas, speaking en route to the UN general assembly, said he had been told by the US and European governments that "matters will be bad" after a move that reflects his frustration with a moribund peace process.

"To what extent, we will know later on," said Abbas, head of the Palestinian Authority, which depends on international financial aid for its survival in the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

BornintheRSA

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
Surely the correct process would be to have an internal referendum before the president can say South Africa will support it.
Avatar

umlilo

Posted 611 days ago
@BornintheRSA:

Would you have accepted the outcome?

And one condemining Israel's atrocities too?

And, will you accept the UN outcome?
Avatar

The_Afrikan

Posted 611 days ago
we cant hold a referendum everytime the government has to make a decision...and any way the best referendum of all is the elections which the ruling won by 60%...i.e. A very clear mandate.

Mercenary

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
Here here mcritic, took the words right out of my mouth, although i think the UN is as relevant now as the ICC is to western leaders, Palestinains have been maimed with the backing of the US and whats happended to the Jews in the holocaust has been underway for decades in Palestine if not worse.

You also cannot have a credible "peace process" while illegal settlements are being build and land being stolen and controlled by Israel as well as the taxes and the economy of Palestine, although i think UN recognition might end up hurting Palestine it will also zoom in on atrocities being committed by Israel, hopefully individual countries will start isolating illegitmate Israel.

Avatar

RogueTrooper

Posted 611 days ago
You are also another uninformed soap-box orator. How can you compare the current Israel-Palestine issue with the holocaust? The 2 are not even in the same paper mill let alone page.
How is Israel illegitimate? They were ratified by the UN in 1948 and internationally recognised so stop talking k@k!!!

Rightway

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
How come Zuma 783 accepts a Palestinian state and not a Boer state in SA. So balkanisation is ok for others but not for us.

Having said that the Palestinians, who have been there for centuries since the Jews were forced out by the Romans, need security from Israeli Zionist. So i agree let them have a state. This would be like apartheid separate development that the ANC so called liberated us from.
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 611 days ago
The difference is, the Palestinian state was proposed by UN whereas Boer state is the brain child of racist separatists. So our president is not stupid to entertain those racists.
Avatar

$$$$$$$

Posted 611 days ago
Boer state is somewhere in the sea........

Whites in this coutry are apartheid mongols...........

RedCoat

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
"The question is why did the Zionist,s go back there in the first place"

I think the answer is, that as gods chosen people they were given the land by god in antiqity,
And therefor i agree with you on the "There will never be peace in Israel" comment as it will ultimately come down to control of Jerusalem which i cant see either Jews/Christians and Moslims ever sharing peacefully.

MisterWendal

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
The Israeli-Palestinian issue is a very complex one. I tend to side with the opinion of Desmond Tutu, someone who has a clearer picture of the Palestian people's oppression, having spent a lot of time in Palestine himself.

Beelzebub

Posted 611 days ago
Avatar
Weird, I am with Zuma on this one. I went to Israel twice in the early 90's and those visits have left me with a deep loathing of Israel. Israel as a nation is a terrorist state.
The occupation is brutal, the squalor is forced upon the Palestinians & basic services are purposely interfered with.
I have met Jews who are not comfortable with Israels behaviour towards the Palestinians, but it blows my mind that those who are descendents of the millions murdered in the Holocaust can be capable of such evil.
Avatar

$$$$$$$

Posted 611 days ago
That is how Jews operate all over the world......
Avatar

BobBobby

Posted 611 days ago
It's a dilemma, but remeber that Isreal is facing people who have vowed to destroy their nation. How do you deal with that? A frightened angry beast cornered fights back. The solution is to reduce the fear, can that be done?
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 611 days ago
BobBobby
I agree with you that there are bad elements within Palestinians that needs to be dealt with accordingly. However Israel must also do the right thing by stopping their occupation. You cannot correct a wrong thing by another. I believe that majority of Palestinians moderate and so they do not deserve collective punishment.
Avatar

vigilantcitizen

Posted 611 days ago
after reading most of the nonsense above, i have to say this is the most...decent" part of the comments so far, constructive critism...yes both sides have flaws they need to deal with, but those Israelis are by far the worst though...i support ZUMA 500% on this one!!!