Battle of the airlines
Image by: PICTURE: ROBERT TSHABALALA
Cash-strapped low-cost airline 1time has turned to the government for a bailout.
The revelation comes only a few days after the Treasury announced that it would guarantee the repayment of SA Airways' borrowings of up to R5-billion.
This lifeline has low-cost carriers seething.
The beleaguered national carrier has incurred losses amounting toR17-billion since the early 1990s.
A week ago it was hit by the resignation of seven of its board members, including chair Cheryl Carolus.
Comair CEO Erik Venter said that the losses being incurred by private carriers meant that they would not be able to operate. He said the lifeline given to SAA was driving low-cost airlines out of the market.
Venter claimed that SAA and government departments we re breaching the state' s own aviation transport policy.
He said nine of the 11 airlines that entered the domestic market since the early 1990s have crashed financially.
The latest casualty was Velvet Sky, which had its wings clipped in March.
Venter would not say that Comair would go so far as to institute court action, but said he wanted to see the government departments complying with aviation transport policy.
The airline industry has been hit by a 50% rise in the price of jet fuel in two years.
The domestic market is suffering from overcapacity - too many seats for too few passengers - a legacy of the optimism of 2010.
Passenger numbers are likely to dwindle further because of low economic growth.
Tariff increases of 70% imposed by the Airports Company of SA have also put immense pressure on the airlines.
The state-owned Acsa is one of 1time's biggest creditors.
1time CEO Blacky Komani said yesterday that his airline owed Acsa as much as R130-million.
Though 1time is not explicitly asking for a bailout, it does request "a reduction in the fuel levy and taxes to the aviation industry to reduce the significant cost of fuel".
Low-cost airlines operate on very thin profit margins and are extremely sensitive to increases in the fuel price.
In a delicately worded document addressed to the departments of transport, public enterprises and tourism, 1time's "business rescue practitioners" ask for "subsidisation".
Gerhard Holtzhauzen, CEO of Strategic Turnaround Solutions, claims a new approach would benefit not only 1time.
"Whilst this document wishes to address [sic] assistance package for 1time airline, it more importantly addresses a rescue package for the industry as a whole," Holtzhauzen wrote.
Apart from calling for a cut in the fuel levy, the document also suggests a reduction in statutory levies imposed by Acsa, Air Traffic Navigation Services, the SA Civil Aviation Authority and the SA Weather Service.
Holtzhauzen said both the Department of Transport and the Department of Public Enterprises could implement the requested subsidy scheme.
Minister of Public Enterprises Malusi Gigaba returned from Ghana yesterday morning and has, according to his spokesman, not seen the document.
But the Department of Transport has acknowledged receipt of the document, according to 1time's Komani.
Public Enterprises is the owner of SAA and its subsidiaries and can, therefore, get the national carrier to buy into the scheme and benefit from it, he said.
The Department of Transport represents the statutory bodies whose levies add to airlines' costs.


SHARE YOUR OPINION
If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.Ziyeka
Posted 257 days agol984
Desmond-ct
deebee
Posted 257 days agoRSA.MommaCyndi
Posted 257 days agoSo how are our Public Enterprises doing in our province of Ghana? It is no bloody wonder that our government has so much trouble keeping things running - none of the buggers are ever in the damn country !!!!
SAA should separate the National Carrier from the local lines (Mango + SAexpress). Nobody would have a problem with the National Carrier getting an advantage from better interest rates as bailouts and governmental assistance is the norm for all country airlines. In fact, considering that the internal airline branch of SAA is losing money at a frightening rate, it could be a good idea just to do away with having a state run internal airline completely and just concentrate on the international trade.
Oh, and for goodness sakes, enough with appointing people on political tickets - it is a sure recipe for a complete train-smash.
deebee
SuiGeneris
Posted 257 days agoKaboom !
I convinced my spouse, who is a frequent domestic flyer, to fly only with BA, long ago.
MicaParis
Posted 257 days agoManagement by political radar entails a monopoly style of administration where the President/Zuma deploy all his ‘’lapdogs’’ to key strategic and financial portfolios, where the cohorts manage tenders on behalf of the ‘’Chief Master’’ with a goal of collective wealth accumulation and ‘’unequal’’ share where the Chief Master get 60% of the proceeds in respect and fear of his superiority.
The SAA had been internalised by that catastrophe, where Zuma instructed Gigaba to get rid of Mbeki contaminated cadres such as Cheryl Carolus so that the ‘’mafia network’’ can kick start since by implications they have already won the Mangaung jamboree!
The *bail out* strategy is of core vital where comrades had created a ‘’network’’ of strategic wealth accumulation in which the bailout is been given by the President through his ‘’lapdog’’ in the treasury so that their accumulated, $proceeds$, can be *covered* instead of procedural legal re-imbursement of the *stolen* money by previous comrades who were at the helm!
SAA is suffering from and had been infiltrated by a *merry- go- round* terminal disease of *same script, different actors* where everybody (political mafia network) do as they pleases.
Unfortunately as usual, since our leaders are not *clever* they always rely on the *pauper* tax payer to lick all the ill deliberately created *wounds* thereby supporting the mafia network by sponsoring them through the ‘’easy cash’’ tax collection.
i_stub_born
Posted 257 days agoBongumusaMabika
Posted 257 days agoIf they are not viable, let them close shop and go home. There is nothing that these low cost airlines would love to see more than seeing SAA down, then with a biggest player out they can collude and start increasing their prices. Ironically again if the government would let SAA die or allow SAA to risk passengers' lives by flying unreliable planes, these same people that are advocating for the bailouts to be stopped will be the ones criticising the government for not helping the airline out.
Personally I only fly SAA and it would be a black day in our history if this airline would go down just because the government refuses to subsidize them. Air passengers also need subsidies like road passengers. Ironically again people do not want to pay e-toll and want government to wholly subsidise the project but they have a problem when the government is doing the same thing in the airline. Please man get a life and stop criticising for the sake of criticizing. As for the airline making losses because it is run by Blacks who are appointed by the ANC, I just wonder where was the ANC in the beginning of the 90s when the airline started loosing the money, and by the way Airlines accross the world run by learned whites do loose money as well.
If fact we had a White American called Collman Andrews or something like that running the airline at some stage and the only way he made a profit and stole big bonuses was through selling the boeing and buying airbus arilines. So this failure cannot be attributed the ANC political appointments.
SuiGeneris
RSA.MommaCyndi
Air transport is not 'subsidised' anywhere in the world. International Carriers are often given bailouts / re-capitalisation funds / state loans but not a single one of them is 'subsidised'. That is not the issue here. Our OWN laws regarding fair trade and competition are the issue.
SuiGeneris
i_stub_born
....As usual ANC cadres CAN NOT distinguish right from wrong and correct from incorrect nor ethical from unethical.......
If your business is sinking because of YOUR OWN mistakes and maladministration and you incur in debts, why do you have to beg the government to get you out of the s.it again???....and what for ??......so you can sit your fat backside again in the chairman's armchair and repeat the same mistakes with an even huger salary...........My ANC....My mirage.......
rob.stone