Please enter your login details

You can also sign in with your Sowetan LIVE
and Sport LIVE account details.
   Sign Up   Forgot password?

Sign in with:

 
  • All Share : 40998.58
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Top 40 : 3361.59
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Financial 15 : 11703.85
    UNCHANGED0.00%
    Industrial 25 : 46637.62
    UNCHANGED0.00%

  • ZAR/USD : 9.5763
    UP 0.07%
    ZAR/GBP : 14.4987
    UP 0.23%
    ZAR/EUR : 12.3835
    UP 0.04%
    ZAR/JPY : 0.0947
    UP 0.14%
    ZAR/AUD : 9.2570
    UP 0.14%

  • Gold : 1386.6000
    UP 0.03%
    Platinum : 1452.5000
    UP 0.31%
    Silver : 22.4000
    UP 0.16%
    Palladium : 727.0000
    UP 0.55%
    Brent Crude Oil : 102.590
    DOWN -0.05%

  • All data is delayed by 15 min. Data supplied by I-Net Bridge
    Hover cursor over this ticker to pause.

Sat May 25 03:58:58 SAST 2013

No-confidence vote: ANC outfoxes DA

THABO MOKONE | 22 November, 2012 00:46
ANC Chief Whip Mathole Motshekga at Luthuli House in Johannesburg. File photo.
Image by: KEVIN SUTHERLAND

ANC chief whip Mathole Motshekga has proposed that the motion of no confidence in President Jacob Zuma be debated in the National Assembly in February next year.

Motshekga, who earlier insisted the matter not be debated at all, yesterday said: "There is no question as to whether or not this matter has to be scheduled."

However, he said, such a debate could not take precedence over MPs' scheduled oversight trips.

Western Cape High Court Judge Dennis Davis will rule this morning on an urgent application by DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko.

Mazibuko asked the court to order National Assembly speaker Max Sisulu to schedule a parliamentary debate on the motion of no confidence for today, before MPs go away for the December recess.

A debate on the scheduling of the motion did not take place yesterday as was expected.

No explanation was given for this.

Motshekga said cancelling MPs' oversight trips to convene a "special sitting" to debate a motion of no confidence on Zuma "would place a significant, administrative, logistical and financial burden" on parliament.

"This type of motion is also serious in nature and could have far-reaching implications for parliament, this country and our democracy, and therefore cannot be arranged hastily or impulsively.

"Members would also need to adequately prepare to enable them to meaningfully engage in this matter," said Motshekga.

"In this regard, we will impress upon parliament that this motion be scheduled for debate by the National Assembly on February 26 2013.

"We believe this is a reasonable time frame," he said.

Nevertheless, both Motshekga and Sisulu have asked Davis to reject Mazibuko's application, arguing it was frivolous and not urgent.

Motshekga said while rule 316 of the National Assembly provides for all motions and other issues on the programme of parliament to lapse at the end of the last day of the sitting house, his party undertook to prioritise the motion next year.

He denied that his proposal was designed to pre-empt the decision of the Western Cape High Court.

"As the majority party, we commit to support the revival of this motion to ensure that it returns back to the House in its current form," Motshekga said.

He promised to contact other parties in parliament regarding this position.

"This position does not seek to pre-empt or interfere with the court process that is currently under way, but to correct the inaccurate view that the majority party is not keen on debating this motion," he said.

A fortnight ago, nine opposition parties all endorsed a motion of no confidence in Zuma in terms of Section 102 (2) of the constitution.

In terms of that provision, the motion can succeed only if it is supported by more than 50% of the members of the National Assembly.

The ANC has 264 seats in the assembly, which means opposition parties need 67 ANC MPs to vote in accordance with them for the motion to be carried.

If it succeeds, Zuma, his cabinet and deputy ministers would be forced to resign.

SHARE YOUR OPINION

If you have an opinion you would like to share on this article, please send us an e-mail to the Times LIVE iLIVE team. In the mean time, click here to view the Times LIVE iLIVE section.

Gormogon1

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
The heading is disingenuous to say the least. Nowhere in the article does it allude to the idea that the DA has been outfoxed. What is does say is that the fool Mathole Motshekga has backtracked on his previous statement and that in the ANC, the left hand clearly does not know what the right hand is doing.
Avatar

deebee

Posted 183 days ago
Precisely. From 'frivolous' to 'absolutely' in a week. The backbone of an unset jelly and the moral authority to match. This is the problem the ANC has: they have no leaders. No-one who is able to actually think things through in a calm and rational manner and come up with a solution that is for the good of the country. It is all just knee-jerk tub-thumping that they shamelessly backtrack on when forced to or when it suits them.

I am desperately trying to hink of a single current ANC bigwig that I can look at and say: there's a helluva leader - with him/her at the helm, we're in good hands. Can anybody come up with one? Someone who has actually IMPROVED the department they have? That has worked tirelessly to IMPROVE the lot of ordinary South Africans?

There are plenty who talk about it, make all sorts of statements, promises, bluster their way through interviews etc - but I can't honestly think of one who has made a real difference.
Avatar

zindela

Posted 183 days ago
100% agreed. You, Gormogon1, are a learned scribe...thanks for posting such an insightful response.
Avatar

mzansi-wanda

Posted 183 days ago
That "fool" holds a doctorate degree in law from a German University. Has published more academic papers than you blogged gibberish on this site. He also heads the Kara Institue.

I don't understand some of the bloggers on this site. If someone is an elected ANC official "he is uneducated" or yes "cadre deployment". If he/she has post graduate degrees than he/she is a "fool". Reminds of how DA candidate with no further education qualification cried "cadre deployment" when the Mayor of Pretoria, Ramokgoba with a Masters Degree in Mechanical Engineering was appointed.

Perhaps, some of you bloggers must form your own poltical parties, since most, if not all of you are paragons of excellence.

By the way, I lost confidence in Zuma and most of his Ministers by 2010. That said, some of your comments are mind boggling and at best, betray an irrational dislike/hatred of people because of their political affiliation.
Avatar

skhokho21

Posted 183 days ago
well said Wanda, they always think they are better than us, wereas some of our leaders are more educated than even Zille. That is why our people will never vote for the DA.
Avatar

SuiGeneris

Posted 183 days ago
skho

Well constructed and informative.....Just a few questions.....

''they''.....?
''always think they are better''.....?
''than us''.......?
''wereas some of our leaders''......?
''are more educated''.......?
''than even Zille''......Good, you mentioned a person !
''That is why our people''.....?
''will never vote for the DA''.....Good, you mentioned a party !
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@mzansi-wanda
Posted 21 minutes ago


If you were next to me I would shake your hands, said all, thumbs up, white people are very disgusting /disgrace in this country, for seeing black people as illiterate, this is continuation of apartheid where blacks were stigmatised with all sorts of nonsense, whenever a white person tells you about ANC people they will tell you about Trevor Manuel whereas he holds FEt certificate in electrical engineering . Thumbs up Mzansi for living Mbekis dream of being an African
Avatar

skhokho21

Posted 183 days ago
SuiGeneris
Let us not b u ll s h i t each other, in this country, black people`s alliance is with the ANC and white people`s alliance is with the DA, let alone those few sell outs on both sides, that is the reality. You can answer your questions now.
Avatar

m1si2zi3nzo4

Posted 183 days ago
Without entering into this fray, Bush (George Jnr) was highly qualified but 'foolish' or plain dumb. So was Professor Hudson Ntsanwisi during apartheid. Perhaps a difference should be between 'certificated' and stupid, or even 'educated'/'learned.'

The issue for me is the use of history - which is what 'teaching' is based on, to foretell what is likely to happen, and not to regurgitate what has been established. Human beings know very little about nature. All available knowledge keeps changing, or expanding, as nothing 'is', but everything is in a state of 'being'. But there are established factors that lead, with reasonable amount of certainty, to certain conclusions about what is likely to result from their certain events.

One most important lesson we of history-call it historical discoveries - is that public leaders, unrestrained by laws and people, easily become tyrants. Cruelty and fraud in private life, indicates the general corruption that is natural to human beings. Humanity has established forms of protection against these, democracy is one, and punishment by laws, as well as moral condemnation, are the other. But tyrants control the instruments that make laws, and control the morality of uneducated masses.

If Motshegka took his 'education' seriously, he would not have been rejected by Gauteng, as its Premier. Law placed him there, but moral condemnation eventually triumphed man-made law. His phoenix-like rise, again, was through supporting a corrupt tyrant, and hence the conflict we now have between corruption and tyranny, and moral condemnation. Law is caught in the middle, as it cuts both ways.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@zindela
Posted 57 minutes ago

100% agreed. You, Gormogon1, are a learned scribe...thanks for posting such an insightful response

===============================

you must be ashamed of yourself being a black woman when a white boy is referring to a black man with Phd as a fool, yet they respect Trevor Manuel with FET cert in elec engineering , you lost your sole black woman , look at yourself again
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@deebee
Posted 2 hours ago


shame on you , the whole world respect the anc, only right wingers of SA dont have respect for ANC , dont see the difference the anc has made in this country, coming back to your question.


1) Dr Zweli Mkhize
2) Dr Motsweledi
3) Cyril Ramaphosa
4) Dr Nksazana Zuma
5) Kgalema


Today we are living in a better SA because of the ANC try to look at SA under your stupid apartheid masters , it was worse than what we see in Zim, look what your white farmers and Zille doing in farmworkers in CT , how do you think the lives of people will change if you pay them R60, these people are suppose to send their kids to school , they govt is fighting poverty/unemployment/hunger yet Zille and white farmers are holding back black people , being a farmer you make huge income we expect workers dependants to receive educational allowances in order to fight poverty/hunger/unemployment, how can you send a child to school with R60 whereas a farmer is making millions from cheap labour
Avatar

kksonuk

Posted 183 days ago
@mzansi-wanda
skhokho21
Which part of the article suggests that ANC OUTFOXED DA. I think that was the question. I also cannot see it.
Avatar

Stirrer

Posted 183 days ago
Really amusing how some black people grasp the title of Dr when they are awarded honourary doctorates, while others are happy to use Mr even though they have more honourary doctorates than the former (think Dr Irvin Khoza vs Mr Danny Jordaan, for example!).
As for this lawyer, Mathole - his "Professorship" is also honourary, as far as I can see!
Avatar

amaKK

Posted 183 days ago
@Robrt010Mugabe99

you must be ashamed of yourself being a black woman when a white boy is referring to a black man with Phd as a fool, yet they respect Trevor Manuel with FET cert in elec engineering , you lost your sole black woman , look at yourself again

----

First of all, from the article..."Motshekga, who earlier insisted the matter not be debated at all, yesterday said: "There is no question as to whether or not this matter has to be scheduled."...

Does this or does this not constitute as foolish (devoid of good judgement) behaviour?

I'm all for pursuing further studies and congratulate Dr Motshekga on his personal achievement. Know this, however, that a PhD maketh not a genius, nor does it, or should it commandeer instant respect. You alluded to that fact by saying that people respect Manuel with his FET.

Deebee has every right to agree or disagree with whomsoever she likes. Your post shows you as a misogynist and racist.

By the way, you did mean to type "soul" not "sole", I take it?

Avatar

Black-Moses

Posted 183 days ago
@ RobertMugabe

''you must be ashamed of yourself being a black woman when a white boy is reffering to a black man with Phd as a fool.''


Just take a further look up north, your namesake Robert Mugabe, has nine academic degrees, and countless honorary degrees. That makes him one of, if not the most educated ''head of state'' under the sun, but he is an unfathomable idiot. A fool beyond imagination.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
Black-Moses
Posted 4 minutes ago



Blahblablahblahblah sour loser, Mugabe took what belongs to africans to africans, no white person can own land in africa
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
This discussion about PhD's.....reminds me of when I was doing my masters and went to discuss an issue with one of RSA few "A rated" international Professors who was busy overseeing another PhD students !
Being a typical nutty prof, he said to me....do you know what PhD stands for .....do you?
I mumbled an answer, which he ignored!?

"Pile of Horse Dung".....he blurted out......clearly, he was not impressed with that particular PhD candidate!

LOL,;).
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
@ Robert Mugabe....."Mugabe took what belongs to africans to africans, no white person can own land in africa ".........actually, the truth is no PEOPLE (black or white) can own land in the majority of Africa! I would guess less than 5% of black africans OWN land in Africa!

This has nothing to do with race, or colour, but everything to do with how the tribal authorities rule their land! It needs to change or the 'land" issue is not going anywhere.

Those tribal authorities need to give title deed(ownership) to each and every "black" family living under their authority ! Then we will see this country and continent take off, economically and otherwise......but until we start seeing meaningful "ownership", as in a title deed and not by "tribal authorities permission to settle/reside"......it will always be a huge problem for all!
Avatar

Black-Moses

Posted 183 days ago
@ RobartMugabe
''Mugabe took what belongs to africans to africans.''


You are totally clouding yourself with your untested rhetoric. Mugabe hardly addresses his subjects in his african language,besides ''imperialist'' language which is English. He does not dress in an African way other than suites, from the Harolds in London, which is English. He goes to Parliament in a colonial English style...yet he is anti British. Politics is an organised syndicate of accumulating wealthy in the interest of ordinary people like you.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@Wiseguy
Posted < 1 minute ago


stop being delusional, village people are educated more than you, stop thinking they are illeterate, in the towns there are magistrates,lawyers,teachers,mayors,nusres,police etc even myself from Nongoma well educated than you think, who told you chiefs must provide title deeds, in actual fact department of rural dev provides certificates of land ownership, thats what I have in my fathers land, title deed is available for municipal land, stop talking on behalf of rural people since you know nothing about it.
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
@RobMugabe.......LOL, truth hurts I guess? You see you are part of the tribal authority and hence part of the problem! Those 15.5 million people living under your "tribal authorities" rule......they are the poorest of the poor..FACT! The overwhelming majority of them have no land in their name.....FACT! Join the dots Einstein?

BTW, Rob, denial is not JUST a river in Africa?
Avatar

staren

Posted 183 days ago
"Blahblablahblahblah sour loser, Mugabe took what belongs to africans to africans, no white person can own land in africa"


Yes Robrt010Mugabe99,

and was that before or after Mugabe ruined the country and destroyed its economy?

But you guys really dont get it do you? Its not about people thinking they are better than others or levels of qualifications, but about the practical implementation of common sense, something that at times seems to be a totally foreign concept to the ANC (or Mugabe for that matter).

Yes things are better for the majority of people than what they were previously, but if the ANC applied themselves with as much gusto to the actual running of this country as what they do to electioneering and self-enrichment and in a manner that suggested some application of integrity, efficiency or forethought, things WOULD and COULD be alot better for the majority than what they are now.

But instead, thanks to the policy of cadre deployment we are forced to suffer the daily bumbling incompetancies and "struggles" (education, housing, amenities, employment, healthcare) of a largely inept government, the majority of whom view their position as nothing more than a path to self enrichment and not as a calling to service, and that is being led by a man who is clearly out of his depth and clearly devoid of the intelligence and integrity that is prerequisite to his position.

And that my myopic friend, is why people complain and dont respect the ANC. Please stop accepting substandard governance as the norm - we could be doing A LOT better.
Avatar

l984

Posted 183 days ago
"amaKK
Posted 1 hours ago
@Robrt010Mugabe99

Your post shows you as a misogynist and racist."

Now I am sure that Robrt010Mugabe99 will take this as a compliment!
Avatar

l984

Posted 183 days ago
"Blahblablahblahblah sour loser, Mugabe took what belongs to africans to africans, no white person can own land in africa"

By the same token no black person should be allowed to own land anywhere else in the world?
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@staren
Posted 6 minutes ago


:................and was that before or after Mugabe ruined the country and destroyed its economy?....................."


========================================

blahblahblahblah how can the economy be stable when the country is in civil war against foreigners owning land , are you telling me the middle east econ should be stable when Israel is invading land unlwafully. The fact of the mmatter is whites in Zim are no more
Avatar

Black-Moses

Posted 183 days ago
@RobertMugabe


Food for thought, never argue with a fool, it will beat you by exprience. I rest my case.
Avatar

staren

Posted 183 days ago
Robrt010Mugabe99

I'm not disputing the ownership of the land or the obvious injustices and inequalities that existed - I'm saying that the manner in which Mugabe went about "repatriating" the land - i.e without any intelligence or forethought of the consequences that it might have for his people - virtually destroyed the country and DID destroy its economy - something that could have and SHOULD have easily been avoided.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@staren
Posted 47 minutes ago

...........without any intelligence or forethought of the consequences that it might have for his people - virtually destroyed the country and DID destroy its economy...........

===========================================

geeese this is clever nheee are you saying when you removed black people by force the econ was nt affected its get affected when whites are pushed, clever nhee.


Let me teach you, when you removed blacks from their land, pilling them in shacks that was a worse scenario ever done by racists masters forcing people out of space where they fend for themselves,turning them state beggars, these people had land, cattles , goats, horses, donkeys, chickens, etc each blacks person had +-250 irrespectively, Im refering to my grandfather who was pushed to an area where his cattles couldnt survived , a cattle costs R8500 x 250 cattles is R 2 125 000 without projecting other live stock, then you come and tell us econ was destabalised by Mugabe
Avatar

staren

Posted 183 days ago
@Robrt010Mugabe99

No bright spark, I'm saying that had Mugabe used a little more forethought and intelligence he could have transferred the wealth of the land to his people without destroying the Zimbabwean economy in the process. Geddit? Its not a competition between which was the worse of 2 evils, ok, its about rectifying the injustices of the past by making things BETTER not WORSE, by building on what you already have, not destroying it.

Understand? Its really not a difficult concept.

SuiGeneris

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
The only one that was outfoxed was Motshekga, by the constitution, therefore his 180 degree turnaround strategy on his own initial statement.
The ANC will never seize to amaze the nation with their notorious ability to unearth the most devious characters from their infinite pool of super intellectuals.

skhokho21

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
deebee
Are you sure you only want one becoz I can give you more than one but seeing that you want one, I give NKOSAZANA DLAMINI ZUMA.
Avatar

Mike123

Posted 183 days ago
Hahahahaha!

Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma couldn't even run the department of home affairs, and being in charge of the AU, is a bit like being the chief clown in the circus.
Avatar

Anticrooks

Posted 183 days ago
NKOSAZANA DLAMINI ZUMA ran a scam with Bongani ngema for Sarafina 2. Vivian Reddy bailed her out by paying back the money. So much for that one!
Avatar

Maxi

Posted 183 days ago
Mike123
Who is your source of information? Everyone knows that Home Affairs was in good shape under Nkosasana Dlamini-Zuma. Check reliable sources.
Avatar

Mike123

Posted 183 days ago
@Maxi: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Home_Affairs_(South_Africa)
Avatar

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 183 days ago
@ Deebee

ANC have got lot of intellects but the problem is that they had since been contaminated and got infiltrated by money, corruption and power which always cloud their judgment and moral compass! But all of them have got corrupt history and dirty tracks along their journey up the political ladder! Take for instance Dr Aaron Motswaledi, the Minister of Health, he is educated and you never hear any corruption allegations against him but what he had done in Limpopo previously is shocking and does not enable him to be the Minister! Another good example is Peggy Ngonyeni, the Speaker of KZN legislature, she is very educated but her track record makes her a clear prison candidate! All the Directors General precisely in National Government has got Doctoral Degrees except Thulani Zungu who was hired because of his corrupt relationship with Tokyo Sexwale in the Human Settlement. But however education alone is not wisdom and intelligence! Look at Zweli Mkhize, the Premier of KZN, he is educated and a good leader but he is not wise and intelligent compared to Hellen Zille! Mac Maharaj has got sizzling qualifications but blundering every single day, ‘’wisdom’’ defeat academic intellect, anybody who is wise can lead, as long as he can read and write! Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King did not have good formal qualifications but had wisdom and were great leaders!
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
@Sasha*-Fierce
Posted 13 minutes ago


................he is educated and a good leader but he is not wise and intelligent compared to Hellen Zille...............

====================================

mcxxxm sies
Avatar

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 183 days ago
Bong!
That does not mean I support the DA but truth is truth, that is a reality that is existing! The difference is that Zille had been able to stare WC into a good direction despite heavy cretinism and deliberate lack of support from the central government! Now, what did Zweli do in KZN with a strong background of the central government and all the stakes holders? All he could achieve was lot of political killings, rampant crime and AIDS statistics right under his nose! Now, that is stupid and incompetent but the comrade is a Medical Doctor though, perhaps the reason why!?

Territc

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
TimesLives get your headlines right.
Avatar

Wort

Posted 183 days ago
Indeed. One doubts whether the subbie even knows the meaning of "outfoxed".

LarryLachman

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
Unfortunately, the DA have been outfoxed by the ANC. The only chance for the motion of non-confidence in Zuma to succeed is if the debate and vote is held prior to the Mangaung Conference, as it would give the non-Zuma ANC MP's the opportunity to remove him by secret ballot before the Conference. Once Zuma is re-elected at Mangaung for the next four years, there will be far less chance of the motion succeeding in the new year when parliament reconvenes.
Avatar

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Erm could you please elaborate on what will have changed in 2 months. Will those that loathe him suddenly rediscover his immense charm?

No sir this is a desperate gamble to buy a few more months of looting time. Thats it.
Avatar

SuiGeneris

Posted 183 days ago
All will depend on Judge Davis ruling this morning.
Will he see the DA's application for the no confidence vote as urgent ?
Avatar

skhokho21

Posted 183 days ago
Why all of a sudden rules must be changed to suite the needs of the opposition, there are no secret ballot votes in Parliament, once a party caucus on the motion a decision will come from Luthuli House to order the ANC MPs to vote against the motion. The opposition want to use the ANC election conference in Mangaung the same way the ABZ is doing. I want JZ to go but not through a motion of no confidence by the opposition assisted by the very ANC. This motion won`t succeed, I say forget the debate, go straight to voting.
Avatar

Bono

Posted 183 days ago
And the looting continues under the guise of so-called “field trips”…..what a joke…these PARASITES makes me sick!!! Unfortunately this looting will continue under the current leadership. The irony is that Zuma will be much stronger if he wins at Mangaung and hence very difficult to un-seat. We can only hope and pray that common-sense will prevail (if this still possible within the ranks of the corrupt ANC.

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
I can only agree with the previous comments about the absurdity of the hl. But on consideration I am left impressed with its very novelty value, lets face it this is in the mould of " Chihuahua Mauls Elephant" in grabbing one's attention.

Stirrer

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
These mischievous headlines are becoming more frequent and more pathetic!
The headline should read that the ANC did a complete about-turn on the reasonable request of the opposition parties (not the DA!) to debate the motion of no confidence in that chap with the compound!.

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
One last thought. The author's obvious relish at what in his (very humble) opinion is a victory leaves one to ponder the meaning of democracy to some of our better paid citizens. Surely a precedent who has cheated stolen, indebted his nation and has elevated loopholism to a science should only be treated with contempt not subtly applauded for his cunning.
Avatar

SuiGeneris

Posted 183 days ago
This ''one term only'' intellectual developed a taste for money - Easy money that pours in while he is sitting in his lazy-boy and applies his mind on extremely important matters.
He then comes forward with the most absurd promises that cannot be implemented.
Our highly educated nation believes him and applauds him.
He likes all the money and attention very much and decides that this is heaven on earth and that he will try to extend this euphoria for another term.
Avatar

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
SUI

Its like the monkey and the orgasm button. You don' t wanna try separating them

Makoya1zn

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
I hate to break it to u all but there will be no voting done in Parliament today. Why must the courts have more power than parliament?.

The imperialists are at it again.
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
Makoya....thats is propogandaristic?

Imperialists, control or seek to their judiciary......much like the house of traditional leaders seeks to control, and usually does control its own "judiciary" in there own way !

No, we are trying to be and become a fair, equal opportunity, non-racial democratic country......and in order for that to happen, all citizens, regardless of status or culture or tribe, should be taught and know how to apply their constitutional rights !

The constitution MUST remain paramount, regardless of anything, if this democracy is to succeed!

m1si2zi3nzo4

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
The comments on this issue prove how stupid populism can be. It takes excessive blogging to keep people away from racist stupidity. Zuma can be dumb, but he certainly understand how stupidity can stay one in power, where you have fewer "clever Blacks" in court. Populism is reflex action. A song, dance, shout, or cry, talk to sentiment, not reason. They trigger the reaction of both animal and the extremely stupid.

Unfortunately, we will remain in this state, and depend on dictatorships like China, for as long as our decisions are made by less than a handful of elite partisanship. Their decisions get rubber-stamped by the extremely stupid party representatives. Then the vulgar, apartheid capitalists, and their BEE, milk whatever they can get from this tyranny. Thus, we get our 'majority'.

l984

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
This is probably the same 'outfoxing' as the way a minibus taxi driver outsmarts, circumvents or violates all other motorists, traffic laws and officials and institutions - or even the way a vehicle or engine are supposed to function or to be used safely. Only to end up one day killing all of his innocent, unsuspecting and unfortunate passengers. There IS such thing as a collective karma - and defending the wrong and the indefensible will only prolong the agony, and in the long term will even backfire on those who think today that they are very powerful and very good at 'outfoxing' everyone else.
Avatar

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Brilliant analogy cher ami !! :}

Thats my movember smiley btw.
Avatar

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Brilliant analogy "Cher Ami" !! :}

Thats my movember smiley btw.


PS wikipedia , "Cher Ami" if you haven't before, for a truly amazing tale.

Avatar

l984

Posted 183 days ago

Thank you, Bokfan mon cheri :)

ProgressiveAfricanDemocrat

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
The DA was clearly outfoxed and outsmarted by the ANC in this case. The main aim of the ANC was to make sure that the matter is not debated this year, particularly in the runup to Mangaung. Even those on the ANC who are opposed to Jacob Zuma's re-election will not support a motion of no confidence because the entire cabinet will have to resign (including Deputy President. And no self-respecting ANC member whether for or against Jacob Zuma would like to see the President of the ANC removed by members of the Opposition. That matter should be best left in the hands of the ANC National Conference. Even if a "No Confidence Debate" were to be held most ANC MPs (even those anti-Zuma) would vote for Jacob Zuma. That is politics. What happens the day Jacob Zuma loses the no confidence vote? Do we have to announce a general election and are the parties ready for that? Or does the National Assembly have to meet and elect a president, and where is the ANC going to get its mandate considering that its members are only meeting in December to elect the national leadership? It is clear to me that the implications of a no confidence vote have not been well-thought out by those involved.

Yes, the DA was outsmarted. The ANC Political Committee headed by Deouty President agreed that in terms of the Constitution such a a motion should not be denied and thus should be debated but did not say when. ANC Chief Whip Mathole Motshekga then called an ANC Parliamentary Caucus meeting to determine whether there was support for such a move and obviously those who were opposed were given prominence. The matter was never put to the vote and not many ANC MPs wouldwant to come out openly in favour of such motion. That allowed Motshekga to come out and outrightly reject the request for a debate as frivolous and could not be accomodated in this year's programme as parliament was rising (today by the way). That gave the opposition parties only a few days to run to court. Before judgment is given the ANC has announced that it is prepared to debate the motion in February next year, Basically Motshekga is still saying that the motion is frivolous but they are only going to debate it next year. Judge Dennis Davis can only say that the motion should have been debated yesterday or should be debated, but he cannot say that parliament should debate it today. That is a "programming issue" which parliament has to deal with. It cannot be that "programming issues" have to go to court. That would set a wrong precedent if the court rules in the Opposition's favour. Motsheka has outfoxed and outsmarted the DA because it is just not feasible to debate the matter today, as MPs have to prepare for it to have meaningful debate. February next year gives MPs enough time to consider the issues.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago


There is mole amongst very busy to destabilse the movement in preperations for 2019 as has been declared DA will be in power by hook and crook. Fortunately the ANC has been tested in numerous occasions and found solid, to explain to you incase you dont understand what you are crazy about , a motion works thus

" A minimum 2/3rds quorum is required (i.e. 2/3rds of all the states' delegations must be present), and the winner must get a simple majority of that quorum"


do you think you will make this, considering your leader Pastor Mvume Dandala previously tried and failed


Mangqeshane

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
Some of the RSA's success stories;
1. The South African Revenue Service's (Sars') chief legal and policy officer, Kosie Louw, has been elected chairperson of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, becoming the first African chair of the forum. Louw will hold the post for a two-year period starting in 2013. "On behalf of the South African government, I would like to congratulate Sars and Kosie Louw on his election as chairperson," Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan said in a statement on Friday.

2.South Africa's First National Bank was named the world's most innovative bank of the year at the 2012 BAI-Finacle Global Banking Innovation Awards

3.South Africa’s Judiciary is amongst the MOST stable institutions in the world


It will be interesting to see what the court says abt the DA led charge. Question, if Zuma is that bad, can the Oppossition Parties have the space they occuppied. I am yet to see an oppossition leader being beaten up by security agents & roughly put inside a van.

This latest move by the oppossition makes a mockery of our Legislative Arm of Government & the Judicial Arm of Govt

Avatar

BokfanSaffer

Posted 183 days ago
Cape Town - best city in Africa and 2nd best in the world
Zille - Best mayor
Paarl and Stellenbosch - Brandies, wines, fruit and cheeses equal to the very best anywhere anytime
Western Cape matric results routinely top in everything except Pedi literature
Maties UCT and Bush still among the best varsities on the continent if not the world
WP Currie Cup Champs

If you like being tops the Western Cape is the place to be. Of course you could make the rest of nation winners too by ditching loser politics.

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
Headline should read---"Political Parties outfox Electorate"

Until our political parties, all of them, realise we must put an end to this proportional representation and elect our political leaders directly, they will all continue playing games with us(the citizens) while they enjoy the power bestowed on them and all the friuts they can reap.
Having political leaders, elected by proxy.......is NOT working!

We must elect our politicians directly, so we can hold them directly accountable for the actions or inactions, their "promises" and their governance!

POWER TO THE PEOPLE !!!!!

CynthiaMulomba

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
The D.A. clutching at straws. They honestly think they can get ANC MPs to vote with them?
All they are doing is campaigning for Zuma and getting him a sympathy vote. I wasn't for the man. But these attacks on him,his family,his home and his person have won me over for him.
The ANC is delaying the debate because it truly is a waste of time.

m1si2zi3nzo4

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
'Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas.' The journo could have shown more interest in other people's ideas, in couching his caption. In any case debating people or parties is more appealing to a country founded and sustained by racism, a nonentity. A mere mention of DA and ANC means 'clever' and 'stupid' in SA'n parlance. Even Zuma regards 'clever' as foreign to 'Blacks', so its understandable how any couching of a caption in terms of 'outfox' is enough to split any debate down the racial line. The same goes with the interpretation of the constitutionalism and tribalism, which should have informed the debate.

From a constitutional perspective, there would be no 'outfoxing' but the interest of the country would have reigned supreme. Instead of debating people's perceptions about their party elite's whims, we would be engaged in a healthy debate about whether the constitution is still a guide towards our freedom. Reading through comments, there is no intelligible debate as to the fact that it took an approach to courts to persuade a ruling party to remember the constitution. This is an encouraging development. But why would it be so? How many approaches to court can we expect before the people charged with ruling our lives, can come to their senses? Who has the stomach to stem this rot? What if the ruling elite overturn this in Mangaung, if the court agrees to the about-turn?

The debate about the 'judiciary interfering with the work of parliament' can come into place then, although partly. As of now, 'parliament' is regarded as the ANC, in which the DA should not say anything, let alone approaching the court in cases of a breach of its procedure. Such hegemony should not be allowed. The ANC will not be in power forever, and may be the one offended by numbers in future.
Avatar

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 183 days ago
M1si2zi3nzo4

Nice comment! Those who are lazy to read will never learn anything!

ProgressiveAfricanDemocrat

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
@Robrto1oMugabe99

Uncle Bob, what are you "crazing about"? You must really do your homework and stop obsessing about COPE. I have never been a member of COPE, and you should know that those who are opposed to Jacob Zuma's re-election now( Fikile Mbalula, Tokyo Sexwale, Kgalema Motlanthe, Bheki Cele, Cassel Mathale, Ronald Lamola, Paul Mashatile, Nceba Faku, Lebohang Maile and many others) are not members of COPE but of the ANC who have been let down big time by Jacob Zuma. The truth is that we cannot let Jacob Zuma continue damaging the ANC and the country. But that matter will be best dealt with by ANV delegates in Mangaung as long as Gwede Mantashe does not allow bogus delegates from Free State, KZN and Mpumalanga to get through. We cannot allow the ZuMantashe leadership and their supporters to continue projecting the ANC as the African National Crooks.

I am definitely not in favour of Zuma being removed as a result of a no confidence vote but it will not be difficult to get a two-thirds in parliament to remove Jacob Zuma. You only need 67 MPs to join with the Opposition, particularly through a secret ballot.However, I do not think it is smart move to kick Zuma out now. Let's leave that to ANC delegates in Mangaung, who will just serve the president with a two-year notice.
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
My brother not my cde as I have seen I m engaged with counter revolutionary here, its clear you dont understand how this law works, thats the reason I say you are cope working with DA for 2019 , suppose you get your 2/3rd which wont happen , it means the cabinet will be dissolved and the country will be under interim regime until the elections are called , this is what you want to see happening under the govt of the anc, of which you claim you represent. The motion was requested by Dandala he failed , Mathole sees this as baseless/friutless exercise instead of dealing with pressing issues of CT
Avatar

ProgressiveAfricanDemocrat

Posted 183 days ago
@Robrto1oMugabe99
I do not understand why the Moderator still keeps you in this Forum since it is clear that you do not even have the capacity to understand the rules of engagement. If you do not agree with view then it means the person you disagree with is a rightwinger, COPE, counter-revolutionary, racist and so on and so on. You probably find comfort in your reductionist and simplistic thinking which is devoid of reality.

First, I have been a proud member of the ANC for decades and know what is and what is not good for the ANC. I must confess that I never thought Jacob Zuma as president was good for the ANC. But you must pay attention to detail, because there is nowhere I say that Jacob Zuma should be removed through a "no confidence vote". I say clearly that such a matter should be left in the hands of the ANC. Yet in your desperation to support Jacob Zuma you are oblivious to the facts and insulting to other forumites. I recommend that the Moderator block you from this Forum if your behaviour continues unabated. I notice that you keep on changing names, probably because the Moderator has blocked you from the Forum but you resurface with a sligght change of name or number but you cannot disguise your uncouth and reckless behaviour.

It seems to me you are a recent comer to the ANC. You come from Nongoma. For many years at least 90% of Nongoma voters voted for Inkatha, with the ANC getting less than 10% of the vote. There is a less than 10% chance that you would have voted for the ANC. It is in Nongoma where ANC campaigners were killed cruelly in broad daylight in 1994, when the area was still a no-go area for the ANC. I have noticed that since Jacob Zuma, who is Zulu, there has been a migration of Inkatha supporters to the ANC in that area and other areas. While we in the ANC welcome the support, what we cannot accept are the violent, rude, vulgar and reckless tactics that many Inkatha supporters (not all) were known for. No so long ago, a friend of mine who is Zulu was telling me about how ANC branches in particular areas were literally taken over by former IFP supporters, who flushed out long-standing ANC members. These are some of the issues that the ANC should look into to ensure that the ANC's character as a non-racial and non-tribal organisation is preserved. That would mean getting rid of people like you or sending you for political re-education. We obviously cannot expect someone who grew up on a tribal chauvinistic diet from Emandleng-Matleng Camp to suddenly behave like a disciplined cadre of the ANC.

i_stub_born

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
.....The ANC is as good as its members.......

If the ANC is plagued with rotten apples starting from Zuma downwards...

If these rotten apples remain and are stubborn to be ejected.......

If the followers do not see the crooks representing them and are so keen in defending the crooks, it is because they themselves are crooks if they are aware of the fact or are too dumb to admit the reality.......

If these crooks and dumb followers dupe or intimidate the ignorant, emotional and poor people.........

....then the whole ANC is full of crooks and rotten apples. They outfox any credible and reputable member this organization might have in its ranks..........
Avatar

Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 183 days ago
..........if the followers dont see the racists representing them and are so keen in defending them , it is because they themselves are racists or are too dumb to admit the reality............
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
@ RobMugabe.....U Sir are a racist of the worst kind.....full of hatred, which clouds your judgement, decisions and intellect! This is most likely the result of Post Traumatic stress disorder! .......Care of Apartheid, like millions of other good citizens of the wonderful country....that would be my guess, but you do need to be a bit introspective and see just how it hinders/shackles your judgement, thoughts and decisions!

Counselling may help.....?
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 183 days ago
...precisely......defending illegality and immorality in your government means 'racism'.....Typical blindness and/or stupidity......

Echoing m1si2zi3nzo4..above and sorry, but it requires repetition:

'""Small minds discuss people, average minds discuss events, great minds discuss ideas.'

From a constitutional perspective, there would be no 'outfoxing' but the INTEREST OF THE COUNTRY would have reigned supreme. Instead of debating people's perceptions about their party elite's whims, we would be engaged in a healthy debate about whether the constitution is still a guide towards our freedom."""

i_stub_born

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar
"""""Fikile Mbalula, Tokyo Sexwale, Kgalema Motlanthe, Bheki Cele, Cassel Mathale, Ronald Lamola, Paul Mashatile, Nceba Faku Lebohang Maile and many others""""

All of these names are associated with corruption and fraud, some more, some less.........

...........the sorrowful attempts of keeping a party of corrupt people in power instead of radically cleansing it eventually leads to the implosion of such party.........
Avatar

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 183 days ago
Zuma and Maile are not fighting but are both corrupt as all politicians in the ''world'' are directly or indirectly corrupt. Power corrupts! Zuma will either chose one of Maile or Masoga to be the next ANCYL President.

I_stub_born

ANC can be radically cleansed only if all political parties compromise their identity in solidarity against the ANC, ankle grabbing the ANC will never help the course! Also 60% of the social grants electorates must be seriously be thought about new democracy and economic freedom in order to vote otherwise! I do not refer to stupid ''ikonomik friidomo'' through the eyes of Julius Malema!!

deebee

Posted 183 days ago
Avatar

@Robrt010Mugabe99

Posted 2 hours ago

@deebee
Posted 2 hours ago


shame on you , the whole world respect the anc, only right wingers of SA dont have respect for ANC , dont see the difference the anc has made in this country, coming back to your question.
1) Dr Zweli Mkhize
2) Dr Motsweledi
3) Cyril Ramaphosa
4) Dr Nksazana Zuma
5) Kgalema
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

First, I'm not a rightwinger - disagreeing with the ANC and believing they're doing a lousy job doesn't automatically make you a racist. In fact, holding them to a high standard, based on the calibre of leaders that negotiated the end of apartheid, demands that I expect the ANC to deliver great services.

It would be racist of me to assume that black leaders can't deliver - it's self-loathing racism and the comfort of victimhood for (some) black people to blindly accept that this is the best it can be. It's not: it can be much, much better. Go to Botswana if you don't believe me; or Namibia; or any one of the many countries in Africa that have - thank God - emerged from their post-colonial victimhood and are today building better societies for all their citizens.

You will, secondly, have noted (although conveniently, flatly ignored) that I said current bigwigs - I didn't say that no ANC leaders have made a great or a positive contribution. But let's look at them:
Zweli Mkhize - since becoming premier of KZN the province has seen factional and political violence on the increase; Nkandlagate; rising poverty levels and concomitant lack of service delivery. Fail.
Aaron Motswaledi - great plans, speaks well, very passionate. Healthcare in the same shambles as when he took over. I personally like him (not that he or you would care and fair enough) but Gauteng's hospitals reel from crisis to crisis, as do those in the Eastern Cape and Limpopo. Fail (but with sympathy)
Cyril - is this Marikana Cyril? And what position does he hold in government? He's a large shareholder in the mines that are being blamed for oppressing the workers though.... Epic Fail.
Nkosozana Dlamini-Zuma: now with the AU, too early to tell if she'll do anything of note there. Also Mbeki's lapdog as Health Minister (before the dead drunk one) who whistled whilst Rome burned.
Kgalema Motlante - what has he done? Acting President for a while, scheming over Mangaung whilst South Africa is crippled by the infighting in the ANC. Can't fail because he refuses to write the exam.

I also note that you don't put forward Jacob Zuma, Siyabonga Cwele (trying to introduce apartheid-style gagging legislation), Angie Motshekga (school debacles), Blade Nzimande (higher education doesn't require literacy apparently), Lindiwe Sisulu (and her jet planes and arrogance), Thulas Nxesi (Public Works and the most corrupt department in SA - close to Sisulu's Defence before she was hoiked out of there), Rob Davies (utterly incompetent trade minister, he's tasked with growing an economy whilst despising the private sector he relies on for this), Mulisi Gigaba (Public Enterprises, most of which are falling apart despite the untold billions taxpayers are being fleeced for). There are many others I could cite who are best treading water, at worst are utterly useless. But all you can do is call me a racist - is that the kind of society you want for your children?

Please, just think about what I've written. I know there are many racist posters on these blogs (although not all of them white either) and I understand the frustrations of reading the usual "this is Africa, what did you expect?" rubbish. I am not one of those people. I spend every day working to encourage investment into Africa and telling the positive side of our wonderful continent. But I won't shy away from telling the ANC that they are currently the worst government this country has had since PW Botha and his scum tried to crush the soul of South Africa.
Avatar

Sasha*-Fierce

Posted 183 days ago
Deebee

A very constructive analysis! No politician had ever been fair, they all have different skeletons!
Avatar

Wiseguy

Posted 183 days ago
Well said DeeBee, very well said!

Hope that brings some rational perspective to things!
Avatar

i_stub_born

Posted 183 days ago
....HA HA HA HA........Indeed!, but do not expect reasoning from the rabid defenders of the indefensible.....