Accused acquitted in high profile Khayelitsha murder case

19 December 2017 - 17:02 By Chumile Sali‚ Groundup
subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now
Sinoxolo Mafevuka left her home on 1 March 2015, she was going to use the communal toilet about 200 metres away, where she was murdered.
Sinoxolo Mafevuka left her home on 1 March 2015, she was going to use the communal toilet about 200 metres away, where she was murdered.
Image: David Harrison

Judge Tashwell Papier found both the accused Xolisa and Athabile Mafilika (Mafilika cousins) not guilty of rape and murder. Sinoxolo Mafevuka was found raped and murdered on 2 March 2015 in SST‚ Town Two Community‚ Khayelitsha. The two accused are the cousins of her boyfriend at the time of her death.

Sinoxolo Mafevuka left her home after 7pm on the evening of 1 March 2015. She was going to use the communal toilet about 200 metres away. She left never came back. Her family assumed that Sinoxolo had visited or slept over at her boyfriend’s place. She was 19 when she died.

In his judgment‚ Papier noted that the state presented no direct evidence linking the accused to the crime scene.

The arrest‚ charge and detention of the accused was based on circumstantial evidence. The state drew inferences of guilt and could not connect the accused to the rape and murder of Mafevuka.

Papier noted the testimony of a Tygerberg Hospital doctor that examined Mafevuka’s body and found that she had been raped and strangled. But the fingerprints and DNA of the accused were not found on Sinoxolo’s body and clothes. But the judge criticised the examining doctor as well as the SAPS investigating officer for not determining the time of death.

Papier also criticised the investigating officer who was removed ten days after the the crime. This officer did not file his notes after interviewing the accused‚ forgot where he placed his notebook‚ contradicted himself in court and could not remember reading the accused their rights.

The judge also found that the state witnesses were not convincing and presented contradictory testimonies. Also the girlfriend of one of the accused corroborated their alibi.

Addressing the Mafevuka family Papier said “The Court is very sympathetic towards the Mafevuka family.” But he found that the court must apply the law fairly and the state must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Mafevuka’s case has been highlighted by the Social Justice Coalition (SJC) as an example of the dangers facing people in informal settlements when they use outdoor toilets. The SJC is campaigning for better sanitation in informal settlements.

The judgment left the Mafevuka family and their many supporters stunned‚ disappointed and emotional. Mafevuka’s mother cried. Her screams reverberated across the courtroom.

* This article was originally published by GroundUp.

subscribe Just R20 for the first month. Support independent journalism by subscribing to our digital news package.
Subscribe now