A biased cross-examination?
On Tuesday, Mentor accused the inquiry of being biased against her evidence and centering the cross-examination on not corroborating her evidence.
"Whatever has corroborated my evidence so far has never been put to me. I felt like throughout the process I have been cross-examined, this is what I have experienced and this is what I feel ... Nothing that corroborated my evidence has been brought forward and I think that's an imbalance," she told the commission.
This happened after Mentor was cross-examined on Monday and Tuesday by advocate Mahlape Sello on claims she made in her 2018 testimony before the commission.