The court ruled in 2021 that the minister was not legally obliged by the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act to make eligibility for assistance from the Tourism Relief Fund subject to the Tourism BBBE Sector Code.
The appeal court said the order it made did not authorise or oblige the minister to recover funds already disbursed from the relief fund.
Despite this ruling, the minister appealed to the ConCourt.
Reading a summary of the judgment, chief justice Raymond Zondo said there were no sound reasons for the court to entertain the matter as it was moot.
He said apart from this, the court's workload had increased after the introduction of the 17th Constitution Amendment Act. The amendment increased the scope of cases the court deals with. Before the amendment, the court was the highest court in constitutional matters, but now it is empowered to also decide other matters.
TimesLIVE
Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.
Top court dismisses tourism minister's appeal on use of 'race-based' criteria to fund sector
ConCourt says case is moot and its workload does not allow it to deal with such matters
Image: Beeld / Felix Dlangamandla
The Constitutional Court on Wednesday dismissed the tourism minister’s application for leave to appeal an order stating she could not use race-based criteria to grant relief to tourism businesses during the Covid-19 lockdown.
The court dismissed the matter with costs and said it had become moot.
During the lockdown, the minister awarded relief from the R200m Tourism Relief Fund to tourism enterprises affected by the pandemic.
Trade union Solidarity and civil rights group AfriForum went to court to review the decision of the department's use of race as a benchmark for awarding relief to tourism businesses.
The high court ruled the criteria used by the department did not perpetuate an unfair advantage for some candidates over others based on race, but had the effect of providing those candidates with a head start.
Solidarity and AfriForum appealed the decision in the Supreme Court of Appeal.
‘Cancel the deal’: angry MPs to SA Tourism
The court ruled in 2021 that the minister was not legally obliged by the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act to make eligibility for assistance from the Tourism Relief Fund subject to the Tourism BBBE Sector Code.
The appeal court said the order it made did not authorise or oblige the minister to recover funds already disbursed from the relief fund.
Despite this ruling, the minister appealed to the ConCourt.
Reading a summary of the judgment, chief justice Raymond Zondo said there were no sound reasons for the court to entertain the matter as it was moot.
He said apart from this, the court's workload had increased after the introduction of the 17th Constitution Amendment Act. The amendment increased the scope of cases the court deals with. Before the amendment, the court was the highest court in constitutional matters, but now it is empowered to also decide other matters.
TimesLIVE
Support independent journalism by subscribing to the Sunday Times. Just R20 for the first month.
READ MORE:
No ambushing with unsubstantiated allegations at the JSC, say draft guidelines
Harvard and UNC race cases present test for US Supreme Court
Sama distances itself from ‘hurtful’ remarks by chairperson on medical student admissions
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most read
Latest Videos