Counsel for the Gupta family argued the Bank of Baroda would not suffer any reputational harm between now and the time of the main application. They also repeatedly indicated that roughly 7‚500 employees will suffer prejudice‚ as the family would not be able to transfer money to their pay agent so that salaries could be distributed if the accounts were closed.
The most damning argument the Gupta family have to defeat came from SC Dennis Fine for Baroda.
Fine pointed out that the contracts signed by the Gupta-owned companies and the Bank of Baroda contain clauses that clearly state the bank may terminate the relationship at its discretion.
“Credit facilities in this regard may be terminated at the bank’s discretion from that date or a date set out in notice of such‚” he quoted from papers.
The Gupta family’s counsel argued that some of the clauses in the contract were contradictory.
Judge Hans Fabricius is presiding over the matter‚ which was argued last week.