Witness 3 said he “did not know” who Koko was at the time, and only got to know who he was two years after seeing him at the Gupta residence.
“He says, 'I recognised him', but you cannot recognise somebody you do not know and somebody you have not seen before,” charged Koko. “Chair, these are the witnesses that are putting my name into disrepute. He says he does not know me but he recognised me two years later.”
Zondo said Koko's defence was “legitimate” and cast doubt on the version put forward by Witness 3.
“There is difficulty with it [Witness 3's version] because, for instance, you say today I saw Mr Seleka and I recognised him, sometime later you say you did not know him but you recognised him,” said Zondo. “You cannot say you recognise somebody when you do not know them. Mr Koko is right to raise that and point out that that part, as it stands, is not without problems.”
TimesLIVE