Kim Kardashian will pay $1.26m (about R22.4m) to settle Securities and Exchange Commission allegations that she broke US rules by touting a crypto token without disclosing she was paid for the promotion.
The SEC said on Monday Kardashian was paid $250,000 (about R4.5m) to post on her Instagram account about EMAX tokens, a crypto asset offered by EthereumMax. Kardashian didn’t admit or deny the regulator’s allegations as part of the settlement in which she agreed not to tout any digital assets for three years.
The reality television star settled the case to avoid a protracted dispute and “so that she can move forward with her many different business pursuits”, said Patrick Gibbs, a partner at the law firm Cooley, who is representing Kardashian.
She “fully co-operated with the SEC from the beginning and she remains willing to do whatever she can to assist the SEC in this matter”, he added.
Wall Street’s main regulator has previously warned that celebrities touting cryptocurrencies it deems securities need to make clear to investors if they’re paid for the backing. In 2018, the regulator fined boxer Floyd Mayweather and music producer DJ Khaled for failing to disclose payments they received for hyping initial coin offerings.
Kardashian included “#AD” at the bottom of the post in 2021, according to the SEC. Despite that, the SEC said investors weren’t made aware of her being paid for the ad.
The main difference between Kardashian’s settlement and earlier ones related to digital assets is the size of the penalty, said Coy Garrison, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson.
“The higher penalty suggests that the SEC is taking a tougher stance against celebrities and believes celebrities are on notice of their need to comply with the anti-touting provision of the securities laws with respect to crypto assets,” said Garrison, who used to work at the SEC.
Wall Street’s main regulator has long asserted that many virtual tokens are securities and under its jurisdiction. To determine whether something is a security, the SEC applies a legal test which comes from a 1946 Supreme Court decision. Under that framework, an asset can be under SEC purview when it involves investors kicking in money with the intention of profiting from the efforts of the organisation’s leadership.
The advertisement was also singled out by the UK’s financial regulator last year as part of a crackdown on crypto endorsements by social influencers. Charles Randell, then chair of the Financial Conduct Authority, said Kardashian’s Instagram post “may have been the financial promotion with the single biggest audience reach in history.”
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Kim Kardashian to pay more than R22m for crypto touting
The SEC said on Monday Kardashian was paid $250,000 (about R4.5m) to post on her Instagram account about EMAX tokens, a crypto asset offered by EthereumMax
Image: Bloomberg
Kim Kardashian will pay $1.26m (about R22.4m) to settle Securities and Exchange Commission allegations that she broke US rules by touting a crypto token without disclosing she was paid for the promotion.
The SEC said on Monday Kardashian was paid $250,000 (about R4.5m) to post on her Instagram account about EMAX tokens, a crypto asset offered by EthereumMax. Kardashian didn’t admit or deny the regulator’s allegations as part of the settlement in which she agreed not to tout any digital assets for three years.
The reality television star settled the case to avoid a protracted dispute and “so that she can move forward with her many different business pursuits”, said Patrick Gibbs, a partner at the law firm Cooley, who is representing Kardashian.
She “fully co-operated with the SEC from the beginning and she remains willing to do whatever she can to assist the SEC in this matter”, he added.
Wall Street’s main regulator has previously warned that celebrities touting cryptocurrencies it deems securities need to make clear to investors if they’re paid for the backing. In 2018, the regulator fined boxer Floyd Mayweather and music producer DJ Khaled for failing to disclose payments they received for hyping initial coin offerings.
Kardashian included “#AD” at the bottom of the post in 2021, according to the SEC. Despite that, the SEC said investors weren’t made aware of her being paid for the ad.
The main difference between Kardashian’s settlement and earlier ones related to digital assets is the size of the penalty, said Coy Garrison, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson.
“The higher penalty suggests that the SEC is taking a tougher stance against celebrities and believes celebrities are on notice of their need to comply with the anti-touting provision of the securities laws with respect to crypto assets,” said Garrison, who used to work at the SEC.
Wall Street’s main regulator has long asserted that many virtual tokens are securities and under its jurisdiction. To determine whether something is a security, the SEC applies a legal test which comes from a 1946 Supreme Court decision. Under that framework, an asset can be under SEC purview when it involves investors kicking in money with the intention of profiting from the efforts of the organisation’s leadership.
The advertisement was also singled out by the UK’s financial regulator last year as part of a crackdown on crypto endorsements by social influencers. Charles Randell, then chair of the Financial Conduct Authority, said Kardashian’s Instagram post “may have been the financial promotion with the single biggest audience reach in history.”
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
READ MORE:
This serves as validation to our entire 'Reyka' team, says Kim Engelbrecht on her Emmy nod
WATCH | Top five Trevor Noah moments on 'The Daily Show'
Coconut Kelz, Lemii Loco, Thuso: Best and worst dressed of the week
Would you like to comment on this article?
Sign up (it's quick and free) or sign in now.
Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.
Most read
Latest Videos